Postage stamps, war memory, and commemoration

2020 ◽  
pp. 183-200
Author(s):  
Manu Sharma
Keyword(s):  
BMJ ◽  
1947 ◽  
Vol 1 (4501) ◽  
pp. 497-498

2020 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 759-760
Author(s):  
Garry Adelman
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 001083672110326
Author(s):  
Kathrin Bachleitner

This article is interested in the formation of war legacies and how they interact with social identities. It suggests a bottom-up approach towards examining the societal processes in which individuals create a legacy of war. It posits that through their narratives of conflict, by remembering what happened to them as a group, they mould the meaning and boundaries of how the group will be membered post-conflict. The validity of the theorised link between war memory and group membership is then tested in the case of Syria. In 200 interviews, Syrians provided their narratives of the conflict and their vision of a future Syrian state and society. The findings show that most respondents’ narratives follow a civic rationale, forming a society around civil rights and political ideas rather than around ethnic/sectarian divides. With this, the article contributes a new route for international relations scholars to understand the formation of war legacies through individuals’ narratives of conflict and explains their effects on ties of group belonging while also offering a glimpse into the Syrian ‘we’ amid the ongoing war in Syria.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Tea Sindbæk Andersen ◽  
Ismar Dedović

Abstract This article investigates the role of 1918, the end of the First World War, and the establishment of the Yugoslav state in public memories of post-communist Croatia and Serbia. Analysing history schoolbooks within the context of major works of history and public discussion, the authors trace the developments of public memory of the end of the war and 1918. Drawing on the concepts of public memory and historical narrative, the authors focus on the ways in which history textbooks create historical narratives and on the types of lessons from the past that can be extracted from these narratives. While Serbia and Croatia have rather different patterns of First World War memory, the authors argue that both states have abandoned the Yugoslav communist narrative and now publicly commemorate 1918 as a loss of national statehood. This is somehow paradoxical, since the establishment of the South Slav State in 1918 was supposedly an outcome of the Wilsonian principle of national self-determination. In Serbia, the story of loss is packed in a fatalistic narrative of heroism and victimhood, while in Croatia the story of loss is embedded in a tale of necessary evils, which nevertheless had a positive outcome in a sovereign Croatian state.


2012 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mangala Anil Hirwade ◽  
Ujwala Anil Nawlakhe

Geopolitics ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 601-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauliina Raento
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document