Reducing Rights in the Name of Convention Compliance: Mental Health Law Reform and the New Human Rights Agenda

2017 ◽  
pp. 125-133
Author(s):  
Philip Fennell
1986 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 266-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Doutney

In the field of human affairs, curiosity prompts us to seek a panoramic view in order to gain a vision of reality that will make it as intelligible as possible for a human mind … A panoramic view will at any rate be a less misleading reflection of reality than a partial view. Toynbee (1972)


2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 38-40
Author(s):  
Kenneth C. Kirkby ◽  
Scott Henderson

Australia has a generally progressive approach to mental health law, reflective of international trends in human rights. Responsibility for most legislation is vested in the six States and two Territories, a total of eight jurisdictions, such that at any given time several new mental health acts are in preparation. In addition there is a model mental health act that promotes common standards. Transfer of orders between jurisdictions relies on Memoranda of Understanding between them, and is patchy. State and Territory legislation is generally cognisant of international treaty obligations, which are themselves the preserve of the Federal Parliament and legislature. UK legislation has had a key influence in Australia, the 1959 Mental Health Act in particular, with its strong emphasis on voluntary hospitalisation, prefacing deinstitutionalisation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document