Robert J. Richards (1986), 'A Defense of Evolutionary Ethics', Biology and Philosophy, 1, pp. 265-93.

2017 ◽  
pp. 323-352
Keyword(s):  
2002 ◽  
Vol 24 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 391-411
Author(s):  
Frederick Churchill
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 147470490400200 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Teehan ◽  
Christopher diCarlo

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020(41) (3) ◽  
pp. 37-50
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Butowski ◽  

The article draws out the issue of morality genesis in the point of view of chosen representatives of evolutionary ethics, understood as a biological theory of morality. Under this theory, morality is the result of cooperation of biologicial evoltion and cultural evolution.


2000 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 245-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Stingl

The error theory of moral judgment says that moral judgments, though often believed to be objectively true, never are. The tendency to believe in the objectivity of our moral beliefs, like the beliefs themselves, is rooted in objective features of human psychology, and not in objective features of the natural world that might exist apart from human psychology. In naturalized epistemology, it is tempting to take this view as the default hypothesis. It appears to make the fewest assumptions in accounting for the fact that humans not only make moral judgments, but believe them to be, at least some of the time, objectively true. In this paper I argue that from an evolutionary perspective, the error theory is not the most parsimonious alternative. It is simpler to suppose that mental representations with moral content arose as direct cognitive and motivational responses to independent moral facts.


2021 ◽  
pp. 388-410
Author(s):  
ROBERT J. RICHARDS
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Catherine Marshall ◽  
Bernard Lightman ◽  
Richard England

The introduction covers a history of the Metaphysical Society, including its aims and membership, role and legacy. After reviewing the previous scholarship on the Society, it lays out the structure of the volume, and introduces some of the figures who formed the membership of the Society, and their widely divergent views on such matters as, miracles, determinism, evolutionary ethics, liberalism. empiricism, intuitionism, and even metaphysics itself. It also discusses how the collection moves beyond past scholarship and draws directly on the papers presented at the Society, detailing the major concepts examined by the contributors, and offering a more detailed analysis of the Society’s inner dynamics and its wider impact on British society and culture. The contributors to this collection include scholars from different fields and different countries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document