Functional Curriculum for Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities

2017 ◽  
pp. 675-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacy K. Dymond
2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 178-195
Author(s):  
Ya-ping Wu ◽  
Ming-chung Chen ◽  
Ya-yu Lo ◽  
Chun-han Chiang

This study examined the effects of an intervention that integrated peer-mediated instruction (PMI) with augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) using speech-generating devices (SGDs). Nine trained peer tutors without disabilities taught science concepts and modeled use of SGDs following a script to three elementary school students with significant cognitive disabilities in Taiwan. Using a multiple baseline across participants design, results showed the PMI with AAC intervention was effective in improving participants’ targeted science knowledge. In addition, participants increased their communicative interactions with peers and increased the use of different communication modes during the science experiment activities with the implementation of PMI with AAC, when compared to the communication responses during the general teaching strategy.


2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 20-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Clayton ◽  
Michael Burdge ◽  
Anne Denham ◽  
Harold L. Kleinert ◽  
Jacqui Kearns

Inclusion ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neal M. Kingston ◽  
Meagan Karvonen ◽  
James R. Thompson ◽  
Michael L. Wehmeyer ◽  
Karrie A. Shogren

Abstract Although there is widespread agreement among both special education experts and general classroom teachers that students with significant cognitive disabilities should participate in inclusive classrooms, most teachers report that they do not know how to do this effectively. One of the challenge teachers face is figuring out how to focus on grade-level expectations, but in a way that is appropriate for all students in such diverse classrooms. The use of learning map models, as exemplified by the Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment, holds promise as a tool to help teachers in inclusive classrooms.


2009 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 301-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold L. Kleinert ◽  
Diane M. Browder ◽  
Elizabeth A. Towles-Reeves

2006 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew T. Roach ◽  
Stephen N. Elliott

The primary purpose of this investigation was to understand the influence of access to the general curriculum on the performance of students with significant cognitive disabilities, as measured by the Wisconsin Alternate Assessment (WAA) for Students with Disabilities. Special education teachers (N = 113) submitted case materials for students with significant disabilities who were assessed using the WAA. Cases included WAA rating scales, students’ individualized education programs (IEPs), and a curricular access questionnaire. Structural equation modeling was used to examine the influence of curricular access on students’ WAA performance. Students’ scores on the WAA Reading, Language Arts, and Mathematics scales were included in the model as the indicators for the latent factor—student performance. Student grade level, teacher reports of students’ curricular access, percentage of academic focused IEP goals, and time spent in general education settings were included as predictors of students’ performance. Results indicated the model accounted for 41% of the variance in the latent factor of student performance. Implications of these results are discussed for the validity of WAA scores and the design of professional development and teacher support materials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document