Fostering Inclusion of Students With Significant Cognitive Disabilities by Using Learning Map Models and Map-Based Assessments

Inclusion ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neal M. Kingston ◽  
Meagan Karvonen ◽  
James R. Thompson ◽  
Michael L. Wehmeyer ◽  
Karrie A. Shogren

Abstract Although there is widespread agreement among both special education experts and general classroom teachers that students with significant cognitive disabilities should participate in inclusive classrooms, most teachers report that they do not know how to do this effectively. One of the challenge teachers face is figuring out how to focus on grade-level expectations, but in a way that is appropriate for all students in such diverse classrooms. The use of learning map models, as exemplified by the Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment, holds promise as a tool to help teachers in inclusive classrooms.

2016 ◽  
Vol 118 (14) ◽  
pp. 1-30
Author(s):  
Neal M. Kingston ◽  
Meagan Karvonen ◽  
Sue Bechard ◽  
Karen A. Erickson

The Dynamic Learning Maps™ Alternate Assessment is based on a different set of guiding principles than other assessments. In this article we describe its characteristics and look at the history of alternate assessment and the problems in implementing useful assessment programs for students with significant cognitive disabilities.


2006 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew T. Roach ◽  
Stephen N. Elliott

The primary purpose of this investigation was to understand the influence of access to the general curriculum on the performance of students with significant cognitive disabilities, as measured by the Wisconsin Alternate Assessment (WAA) for Students with Disabilities. Special education teachers (N = 113) submitted case materials for students with significant disabilities who were assessed using the WAA. Cases included WAA rating scales, students’ individualized education programs (IEPs), and a curricular access questionnaire. Structural equation modeling was used to examine the influence of curricular access on students’ WAA performance. Students’ scores on the WAA Reading, Language Arts, and Mathematics scales were included in the model as the indicators for the latent factor—student performance. Student grade level, teacher reports of students’ curricular access, percentage of academic focused IEP goals, and time spent in general education settings were included as predictors of students’ performance. Results indicated the model accounted for 41% of the variance in the latent factor of student performance. Implications of these results are discussed for the validity of WAA scores and the design of professional development and teacher support materials.


1997 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Ann Tomlinson ◽  
Carolyn M. Callahan ◽  
Ellen M. Tomchin ◽  
Nancy Eiss ◽  
Marcia Imbeau ◽  
...  

Increasingly, general classroom teachers are expected to be primary service providers for a full range of learners in inclusive classrooms. Research indicates that many veteran teachers are reluctant or unable to differentiate instruction for academically diverse learners in heterogeneous settings. This qualitative study examined the preservice experiences of 70 novice teachers at six university sites to determine conditions that may inhibit or facilitate their progress toward differentiation for academically diverse learners. Themes emerging from this investigation provide important guidelines for assisting beginning teachers in differentiating instruction in inclusive classrooms.


2007 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane M. Browder ◽  
Shawnee Y. Wakeman ◽  
Claudia Flowers ◽  
Robert J. Rickelman ◽  
Dave Pugalee ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-86
Author(s):  
Meagan Karvonen ◽  
Amy K. Clark

There is a dearth of research describing the small population of students who have significant cognitive disabilities and are also English learners (ELs). This study expands what is known about this population by describing EL students who participated in Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessments in 16 states during the 2016-2017 year. Data sources include (a) teacher responses to a survey of student characteristics, including items about academic skills, expressive and receptive communication, and classroom setting; (b) accessibility supports used during assessment; (c) students’ alternate assessment results; and (d) student EL services. Results are described for students identified as ELs, likely-ELs, and non-ELs. Analyses identified small but statistically significant group differences in academic and expressive-communication complexity levels, mean receptive-communication scores, instructional setting, and overall performance differences for likely-ELs compared with their peers, indicating a need for further research on instructional and assessment approaches teachers take for addressing these students’ needs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document