A VAGUE ISSUE OF EXISTENCE: THE CASE OF TURKEY ON WOMEN’S RIGHT TO VOTE AND BE ELECTED (1930-1960)

The relevance of the interpretation of constitutional and legal guarantees of the right to vote is mediated by isolated scientific research in this area, as well as the lack of a universal approach to legal guarantees. In this regard, the purpose of the article is to argue and disclose the author’s definitive aspect of the claimed guarantees. In the work, the author named and characterized the normative (based exclusively on legal means) with the perspective of a branch of legal and technical; regulatory and institutional (combines the formal aspect with the activities of authorized entities) and associated legal (including a set of legal and other aspects) approaches to the definition of legal guarantees. Based on the second approach, as well as combining the guarantees of the right to vote directly guarantees of the subjective right itself and guarantees of its implementation, the author offers a definition of constitutional and legal guarantees of the right to vote.

The Kenyan Diaspora and Their Right to Vote: Is it a Reality or Mirage under the New Constitution

10.2139/ssrn.1847690 ◽

2011 ◽

Author(s):

Alfred Oseko Nyanchoka

Keyword(s):

Right To Vote

Inequality in Right to Vote: Migration & Vote in India

10.2139/ssrn.2216807 ◽

2013 ◽

Author(s):

Ravi Nitesh

Keyword(s):

Right To Vote

Do Direito De Votar Ao Dever De Participar: Uma Proposta Para a Melhoria Da Qualidade Da Democracia Brasileira (From the Right to Vote to the Duty to Participate: A Proposal for Improving the Quality of Brazilian Democracy)

10.2139/ssrn.2654736 ◽

2015 ◽

Author(s):

Matheus Passos Silva

Keyword(s):

Right To Vote ◽

Realizing the Right to Vote: The Story of Thornburg v. Gingles

10.2139/ssrn.2697007 ◽

2015 ◽

Author(s):

Daniel P. Tokaji

Keyword(s):

Right To Vote ◽

The Value of the Right to Vote

10.2139/ssrn.2740502 ◽

2016 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Stephan Tontrup ◽

Rebecca Morton

Keyword(s):

Right To Vote ◽

Criminal Convictions, Incarceration, and the Right to Vote in South Carolina

10.2139/ssrn.3369106 ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

Elizabeth G. Patterson ◽

Julia Bradshaw ◽

Chelsea Evans ◽

Ryan Nash ◽

William Neinast ◽

...

Keyword(s):

South Carolina ◽

Criminal Convictions ◽

Right To Vote ◽

Right to Vote: Students’ Involvement in Student Government Elections

10.2139/ssrn.3442910 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Joseline Santos ◽

Carla Ac-ac ◽

Liana Marie Dela Cruz ◽

Marco Ramos ◽

Marielle Angeli Villafuerte

Keyword(s):

Student Government ◽

Right To Vote

Arkansas Women and the Right to Vote

10.2307/j.ctt1ffjqhn ◽

2015 ◽

Author(s):

Bernadette Cahill

Keyword(s):

Right To Vote ◽

Comparative Views on the Right to Vote in International Law

10.1093/oso/9780190697570.003.0018 ◽

2018 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Shai Dothan

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

National Courts ◽

European Court ◽

Right To Vote ◽

The Right ◽

Democratic Elections ◽

The Way

There is a consensus about the existence of an international right to vote in democratic elections. Yet states disagree about the limits of this right when it comes to the case of prisoners’ disenfranchisement. Some states allow all prisoners to vote, some disenfranchise all prisoners, and others allow only some prisoners to vote. This chapter argues that national courts view the international right to vote in three fundamentally different ways: some view it as an inalienable right that cannot be taken away, some view it merely as a privilege that doesn’t belong to the citizens, and others view it as a revocable right that can be taken away under certain conditions. The differences in the way states conceive the right to vote imply that attempts by the European Court of Human Rights to follow the policies of the majority of European states by using the Emerging Consensus doctrine are problematic.