scholarly journals Etomidate compared to Ketamine for Induction during Rapid Sequence Intubation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-113
Author(s):  
Saurabh C Sharda ◽  
Mandip S Bhatia
2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 578-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pieter F. Fouche ◽  
Christopher Stein ◽  
Paul Simpson ◽  
Jestin N. Carlson ◽  
Kristina M. Zverinova ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-459.e20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pieter F. Fouche ◽  
Christopher Stein ◽  
Paul Simpson ◽  
Jestin N. Carlson ◽  
Suhail A. Doi

2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement 37) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Ch. Lysakowski ◽  
L. Suppan ◽  
E. Tassonyi ◽  
Ch. Czarnetzki ◽  
M. Tramer

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Zhao Li ◽  
Li Xu ◽  
Jinwei Zheng ◽  
Qingxiu Wang

The present study aims to investigate whether intravenous dexmedetomidine shows superiority to esmolol for hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation after rapid sequence induction. In the present meta-analysis, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for trials comparing dexmedetomidine with esmolol for the attenuation of the hemodynamic response to intubation. Ten trials were selected in the present meta-analysis. Compared to esmolol, the use of dexmedetomidine maintains stable heart rates (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 1 min, 3 min, and 5 min after tracheal intubation. Dexmedetomidine causes less hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation after rapid sequence induction compared with esmolol.


2021 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 110265
Author(s):  
Clístenes Crístian de Carvalho ◽  
Danielle Melo da Silva ◽  
Stéphanie Leite Pessoa de Athayde Regueira ◽  
Ana Beatriz Sá de Souza ◽  
Caroline Oliveira Rego ◽  
...  

Anaesthesia ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 765-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. T. T. Tran ◽  
E. K. Newton ◽  
V. A. H. Mount ◽  
J. S. Lee ◽  
C. Mansour ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document