scholarly journals A Global Epidemic of Rising Trend of Cesarean Section: Needed Serious Efforts by All Stakeholders to Curb It

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 00-00
Author(s):  
Prof Dr Ganesh Dangal ◽  
Dr Rekha Poudel
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Global Epidemic

A New Way of Evaluating Cesarean Section Birth: The Robson's Ten Group Classification System

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-216
Author(s):  
Indra Bhati ◽  
Akriti Jha ◽  
Nishu Agarwal
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
World Health ◽  
Group V ◽  
Global Epidemic ◽  
Nulliparous Women ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Health Organization

ABSTRACT Introduction Cesarean section (CS) is the most common obstetric surgery and one of the most rewarding surgeries performed. The number of CSs has been growing rapidly, and concern has been expressed at the growing rate in some countries, with some referring to it as an emerging “global epidemic.” Aim The purpose of this study was to study the incidence and analyze different indications of CS in our institution and to compare the frequency of CS in Robson's ten group classification system (TGCS). Materials and methods A prospective hospital-based study for a duration of 3 months (January 2012 to March 2012) was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umaid Hospital, Jodhpur. All patients admitted beyond 20 weeks gestation were included in the study, and record of all births during this period was evaluated. Each delivery was then classified into one of ten mutually exclusive categories according to obstetric characteristics. The information was used to identify the group that accounted for largest proportion of women or group that contributed most to CS and identify the areas for potential modification. Results We found cesarean rate of 28.6% during our study period, which is well above the World Health Organization guidelines. Group V (single, term, cephalic, previous CS) was the largest contributor to CS rates (30.4%). Groups I and II were the 2nd and 3rd largest contributors, i.e., 27.5 and 17.5% respectively. Maximum CS rate of 100% was found in group IX (abnormal lie), which was within the expected range. Group 2 had CS rate more than that of group I, and IV had a rate more than that of group I, which indicates that induction and cesarean before labor increases cesarean rate in both multiparous and nulliparous women. In our study, Robson's TGCS demonstrated the need to focus on groups I, II, III, and V because the contribution of these groups to overall cesarean rate was 82%. Clinical significance Ten group classification system was found to be a useful framework for auditing and analyzing different CS rates and their reasons. This will help in not only identifying the priority areas for the changes in clinical practice but also reducing cesarean rate. How to cite this article Bhati I, Jha A, Agarwal N. A New Way of Evaluating Cesarean Section Birth: The Robson's Ten Group Classification System. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae 2016;8(3):212-216.

A Case of Emergency Cesarean Section on Client with Pseudopregnancy

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Fetal Heart Rate ◽  
Medical Service ◽  
Fetal Heart ◽  
Placenta Previa ◽  
Urban Hospital ◽  
Emergency Cesarean Section ◽  
Emergency Cesarean ◽  
Rural Health Center

Pseudopregnancy detection is significant while as the false pregnancy may show all symptoms. It is important to differentiate it. This is a case report of a pseudopregnancy which led to an emergency cesarean section. A 28-year-old woman who claimed to 7-month pregnancy was brought to the rural health center by husband families complaining of vaginal bleeding. The woman refers to an urban hospital by Emergency Medical Service with the diagnosis of placenta previa. In the hospital, she underwent an emergency cesarean section due to a severe deceleration of fetal heart rate, prior to assessing by sonography. No fetus or signs of uterine or abdominal pregnancy were found. Wrong auscultation of the mother's heart rate instead of fetal heart rate seems to be the main error. It is required to pay more attention to the methods of differentiation of fetal heart rate from the mother's heart rate. This report enlightens false pregnancy and early differentiation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document