A New Way of Evaluating Cesarean Section Birth: The Robson's Ten Group Classification System

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-216
Author(s):  
Indra Bhati ◽  
Akriti Jha ◽  
Nishu Agarwal
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
World Health ◽  
Group V ◽  
Global Epidemic ◽  
Nulliparous Women ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Health Organization

ABSTRACT Introduction Cesarean section (CS) is the most common obstetric surgery and one of the most rewarding surgeries performed. The number of CSs has been growing rapidly, and concern has been expressed at the growing rate in some countries, with some referring to it as an emerging “global epidemic.” Aim The purpose of this study was to study the incidence and analyze different indications of CS in our institution and to compare the frequency of CS in Robson's ten group classification system (TGCS). Materials and methods A prospective hospital-based study for a duration of 3 months (January 2012 to March 2012) was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umaid Hospital, Jodhpur. All patients admitted beyond 20 weeks gestation were included in the study, and record of all births during this period was evaluated. Each delivery was then classified into one of ten mutually exclusive categories according to obstetric characteristics. The information was used to identify the group that accounted for largest proportion of women or group that contributed most to CS and identify the areas for potential modification. Results We found cesarean rate of 28.6% during our study period, which is well above the World Health Organization guidelines. Group V (single, term, cephalic, previous CS) was the largest contributor to CS rates (30.4%). Groups I and II were the 2nd and 3rd largest contributors, i.e., 27.5 and 17.5% respectively. Maximum CS rate of 100% was found in group IX (abnormal lie), which was within the expected range. Group 2 had CS rate more than that of group I, and IV had a rate more than that of group I, which indicates that induction and cesarean before labor increases cesarean rate in both multiparous and nulliparous women. In our study, Robson's TGCS demonstrated the need to focus on groups I, II, III, and V because the contribution of these groups to overall cesarean rate was 82%. Clinical significance Ten group classification system was found to be a useful framework for auditing and analyzing different CS rates and their reasons. This will help in not only identifying the priority areas for the changes in clinical practice but also reducing cesarean rate. How to cite this article Bhati I, Jha A, Agarwal N. A New Way of Evaluating Cesarean Section Birth: The Robson's Ten Group Classification System. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae 2016;8(3):212-216.

scholarly journals Cesarean Section Rate Analysis in a Tertiary Hospital in Portugal According to Robson Ten Group Classification System

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (06) ◽  
pp. 310-315
Author(s):  
Sara Vargas ◽  
Susana Rego ◽  
Nuno Clode
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
World Health ◽  
Rate Analysis ◽  
Vaginal Deliveries ◽  
The World ◽  
Obstetric Population ◽  
Health Organization

Abstract Objective The Robson 10 group classification system (RTGCS) is a reproducible, clinically relevant and prospective classification system proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a global standard for assessing, monitoring and comparing cesarean section (CS) rates. The purpose of the present study is to analyze CS rates according to the RTGCS over a 3-year period and to identify the main contributors to this rate. Methods We reviewed data regarding deliveries performed from 2014 up to 2016 in a tertiary hospital in Portugal, and classified all women according to the RTGCS. We analyzed the CS rate in each group. Results We included data from 6,369 deliveries. Groups 1 (n = 1,703), 2 (n = 1,229) and 3 (n = 1,382) represented 67.7% of the obstetric population. The global CS rate was 25% (n = 1,594). Groups 1, 2, 5 and 10 were responsible for 74.2% of global CS deliveries. Conclusion As expected, Groups 1, 2, 5 and 10 were the greatest contributors to the overall CS rate. An attempt to increase the number of vaginal deliveries in these groups, especially in Groups 2 and 5, might contribute to the reduction of the CS rate.

scholarly journals Classification of caesarean section based on Robson ten group classification system in our hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 4232
Author(s):  
Ari Sharma ◽  
Dipika Singh ◽  
Sarika Verma ◽  
Sanjog Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
New Delhi ◽  
Group V ◽  
Nulliparous Women ◽  
Group I ◽  
Spontaneous Labour

Background: Recent data indicate that one in five women undergo caesarean section (CS). In the last decade, there has been a dramatic increase in the caesarean section rate worldwide, which now exceeds 30% in some regions. Thus, the increasing rate of caesarean section became a matter of international public health concern. Our study aimed to classify the CS-based on Robson ten group classification system (RTGCS) criteria which will subsequently enable us to standardise the indication of CS and establish protocols to reduce the number of CS in our set up.Method: A retrospective study was conducted in ESI Hospital, New Delhi wherein Robson TGCS was used to classify CS for 15 months (January 2019 to April 2020).Results: Overall CS rate in our hospital over the specified period was 34.5%. All women with one or more previous cesareans (group V) had the maximum number of cesareans, 37%, followed by nulliparous, single, cephalic, term pregnancy (induced) i.e group II, 22.1% and nulliparous women more than 37 weeks in spontaneous labour (group I), 9.5%.Conclusions: RTGCS is easy to comprehend and reproduce. All deliveries and cesareans should be universally categorized by the Robsons TGCS. An attempt should be made to evaluate the group contributing most to the CS rate and interventions should be made accordingly.

scholarly journals Prevalence of Cesarean Section Based on Robson’s Classification in Selected Delivery Centers of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zohreh Rookesh ◽  
Mahnaz Zarshenas ◽  
Marzieh Akbarzadeh
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Descriptive Statistics ◽  
World Health ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Nulliparous Women ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
The World ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Health Organization

Background: Cesarean section is performed to save the lives of the mother and the fetus. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the expected cesarean section rate in different countries should be 10% - 15%, which is about 72.1% in Iran. Objectives: Therefore, due to the high prevalence of cesarean section, the present study was conducted to determine the prevalence of cesarean section based on Robson’s classification in selected hospitals of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Methods: This descriptive-prospective study was conducted among 1787 women who had undergone a cesarean section in Hazrat Zeinab and Hafez hospitals of Shiraz in 2018. The data were collected by the researcher from the data recorded in the two delivery centers, and all the women were classified into 10 Robson groups. Cesarean section was calculated for each group of Robson’s classification. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (frequency and percentage) in SPSS, version 22. Results: Findings showed that 63.4% of the deliveries were performed through cesarean section, and the highest frequency (46.6%) was related to group 5, followed by group 2 (19.5%). Conclusions: Given the high Prevalence of cesarean section observed in this study, it is recommended that the rate of cesarean section should be reduced in nulliparous women (group 2), and vaginal delivery should be increased after cesarean section (group 5).

scholarly journals OBSTETRIC AUDIT BASED ON ROBSON TEN-GROUP CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-48
Author(s):  
Anatoly E. Miroshnikov ◽  
N. A Zharkin
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
World Health ◽  
Initial State ◽  
Cesarean Section Delivery ◽  
Main Determinants ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Abdominal Delivery

The problem of the increase in the frequency of Cesarean section delivery has not been resolved yet. Firstly, a large variation in the initial state of puerpera, secondly, a wide variety of indications to the operation fail to allow revealing main determinants. In order to develop and implement effective measures to reduce the rate of the abdominal delivery, an understandable, logical classification of patients is necessary. The World Health Organization recommends the use of Robson Ten-Group Classification System. This study executed with the use of the Robson scale reveals the contingent of patients in whom the decline in the frequency of abdominal deliveries is possible. The authors propose a set of measures aimed at reducing the rate of Cesarean section in institutions of the second level.

scholarly journals Analysis of Cesarean Section Rate using Robson's Ten Group Classification System and comparing the Trend at a Tertiary Hospital for 2 Years

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-180
Author(s):  
RC Prameela ◽  
Gatta Shilpa ◽  
Asma Farha ◽  
S Prajwal
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Relative Size ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Cesarean Section Rate ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Group I ◽  
Labor Ward ◽  
Operative Notes

ABSTRACT Aims and objectives To classify the cesarean section (CS) in different groups of Robson's ten-group classification system (TGCS) and comparing the rate and relative size of groups with that of previous year at the tertiary hospital. Materials and methods This retrospective study was conducted in Cheluvamba Hospital, which is a tertiary hospital attached to Mysore Medical College & Research Institute, Mysuru, between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014. The data collected was compared with the previous year data between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013. The data collected included parity, mode of previous delivery, gestational age, onset of labor-spontaneous or induced, delivery notes of labor ward, and operative notes of CS. This data was then applied to the Robson's TGCS for the year 2014 and compared with that of 2013. Results The total deliveries during 2014 were 12,930 and in 2013 were 15,182. The number of CSs during 2014 was 3,793 and in 2013 it was 3,917. Cesarean section rate in 2014 was 29.33% while in 2013 it was 25.8%. The CS rate has come down to half in group I (nulliparous, single, cephalic. 37 weeks, in spontaneous labor) and to onefourth in group III [multiparous (excluding previous CS) single, cephalic. 37 weeks, in spontaneous labor] in 2014. Conclusion Robson's TGCS is easy to classify. Clinical significance The study showed reduction in CS rate by half in group I and by one-third in group III in 2014 in our institution. This was probably due to the increased awareness among the staff of the institute by the previous year study about higher CS rate. How to cite this article Prameela RC, Shilpa G, Farha A, Prajwal S. Analysis of Cesarean Section Rate using Robson's Ten Group Classification System and comparing the Trend at a Tertiary Hospital for 2 Years. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae 2016;8(3):175-180.

scholarly journals Results of Using the Robson Classification in Kazakhstan

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (B) ◽  
pp. 663-669
Author(s):  
Assel Askarovna Altayeva ◽  
Saule Shaykenovna Issenova ◽  
Egle Machtejeviene ◽  
Gani Zhandiyarovich Bodykov ◽  
Balzira Nagashibaevna Bishekova
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Computer Application ◽  
World Health ◽  
Operative Delivery ◽  
Robson Classification ◽  
Relative Contribution ◽  
Nulliparous Women ◽  
Level Ii ◽  
The World ◽  
Health Organization

BACKGROUND: Over the past few decades, the cesarean section frequency has increased significantly in many countries around the world, especially in the countries with high and medium income. The World Health Organization recommends 10–15% as the optimum cesarean section frequency. In Kazakhstan, the frequency of operative delivery in 2018 was 23.5%. AIM: The article is aimed at analyzing the caesarean section frequency following the Robson classification in Kazakhstan at Level II and III obstetric institutions, identifying the groups that make the greatest contribution to the overall cesarean section frequency, studying the clinical reasons in these groups, and identifying the ways to reduce unneeded cesarean sections. METHODS: A prospective study was performed at the Level II and III obstetric facilities in Almaty. On admission for delivery, all women were assigned following the Robson classification. The indices of cesarean section in each of 10 groups and the absolute and relative contribution to the overall cesarean section frequency were calculated. The patient data were prospectively entered into a computer application and processed in MS Excel and Statistica version 23. The results were presented using the Robson classification. The odds ratios were calculated with a confidence interval of 95%. RESULTS: For the period from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019, 12,395 women parturiated at Level II and III obstetric facilities. The main contributors to the overall cesarean section frequency at Level II and III obstetric facilities were Group 5 (multiparous women with uterine scars) – 46.3% (Level II facility) and 37.5% (Level III facility), Group 2 (12.4%) and (12.4%), Group 1 (12%) and (9.6%), and Group 10 (11.4%) at the Level III facility. CONCLUSION: The Robson classification has been used for the 1st time in Kazakhstan which has made it possible to identify the reasons that make the greatest contribution to the overall cesarean section frequency. The use of monitoring for analyzing the cesarean section frequency will make it possible to compare the Kazakhstan data with the foreign data and determine the organizational measures aimed at reducing the frequency of operative delivery. The strategies to reduce unneeded cesarean section should focus on reducing the cesarean section frequency in nulliparous women. In the absence of contraindications, natural delivery should be advised to the women with uterine scars.

Novel Coronavirus 2019 Outbreak: A Global Epidemic

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 1458-1464
Author(s):  
Sweta Kamboj ◽  
Rohit Kamboj ◽  
Shikha Kamboj ◽  
Kumar Guarve ◽  
Rohit Dutt
Keyword(s):  
World Health ◽  
Upper Respiratory Tract ◽  
Global Epidemic ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Government ◽  
Tract Disease ◽  
The 1960S ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
The Impact

Background: In the 1960s, the human coronavirus was designated, which is responsible for the upper respiratory tract disease in children. Back in 2003, mainly 5 new coronaviruses were recognized. This study directly pursues to govern knowledge, attitude and practice of viral and droplet infection isolation safeguard among the researchers during the outbreak of the COVID-19. Introduction: Coronavirus is a proteinaceous and infectious pathogen. It is an etiological agent of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS). Coronavirus, appeared in China from the seafood and poultry market last year, which has spread in various countries, and has caused several deaths. Methods: The literature data has been taken from different search platforms like PubMed, Science Direct, Embase, Web of Science, who.int portal and complied. Results: Corona virology study will be more advanced and outstanding in recent years. COVID-19 epidemic is a threatening reminder not solely for one country but all over the universe. Conclusion: In this review article, we encapsulated the pathogenesis, geographical spread of coronavirus worldwide, also discussed the perspective of diagnosis, effective treatment, and primary recommendations by the World Health Organization, and guidelines of the government to slow down the impact of the virus are also optimistic, efficacious and obliging for the public health. However, it will take a prolonged time in the future to overcome this epidemic.

scholarly journals Health and fertility in World Health Organization group 2 anovulatory women

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 586-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
D. T. Baird ◽  
A. Balen ◽  
H. F. Escobar-Morreale ◽  
J. L. H. Evers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
World Health Organization ◽  
World Health ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Health Organization

scholarly journals When to resume bariatric surgery after COVID-19 pandemic?: results of patients’ and surgeons’ survey

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alicja Dudek ◽  
Michał Wysocki ◽  
Maciej Walędziak ◽  
Jacek Szeliga ◽  
Monika Proczko-Stepaniak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
World Health ◽  
Online Surveys ◽  
The World ◽  
Bariatric Patients ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Current Body Mass Index ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background Coronavirus Disease 2019 is affecting most countries around the world, including Poland. In response, all elective surgeries have been postponed. We asked patients and surgeons when they want bariatric surgery to resume after pandemic. The main aim of the study was to determine patients’ and surgeons’ expectations about when to resume bariatric surgery regarding COVID-19 pandemic state. Methods The study was conducted in two groups: Group 1—bariatric patients; Group 2—bariatric surgeons. Two online surveys were distributed. Results A total of 895 patients, 299 before, 596 after surgery and 32 surgeons took part in survey. All patients and surgeons declared willingness to resume bariatric surgeries after pandemic and responded that they should be resumed immediately the World Health Organization announces end of pandemic (42%). The majority of patients before surgery answered that bariatric procedures should be resumed immediately the number of daily incidents begins to decrease (53%). In the patient group, current body mass index (p < 0.001) and contact with COVID+/quarantined persons (p < 0.001) had impact on the response to resumption of bariatric procedures. Conclusions Patients opted to wait for bariatric surgery until the oncological queue has become shorter. Surgeons presented a readiness to resume both procedures in parallel.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document