scholarly journals Clinical results of operative treatment of the lumbar disc herniation (A comparison of the result obtained in a series of non-fusion and posterior interbody or posterolateral fusion)

1984 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 994-998
Author(s):  
T. Egawa ◽  
K. Tomonaga ◽  
T. Niimura ◽  
Y. Yamane ◽  
H. Kobayashi
1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 752-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBERT B. KELLER ◽  
STEVEN J. ATLAS ◽  
DAVID N. SOULE ◽  
DANIEL E. SINGER ◽  
RICHARD A. DEYO

1985 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 372-378
Author(s):  
Kazumori Arimura ◽  
Ken Takara ◽  
Hiroshi Fukuyama ◽  
Masatoshi Matsuoka

Spine ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 450-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshichika Takeshima ◽  
Kanji Kambara ◽  
Shigeki Miyata ◽  
Yurito Ueda ◽  
Susumu Tamai

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 500-506
Author(s):  
Akira Matsumura ◽  
Sadayuki Takeuchi ◽  
Takashi Tsunoda ◽  
Satoshi Ayuzawa ◽  
Atsushi Saito ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 4;16 (4;7) ◽  
pp. 359-367
Author(s):  
Jeong Yoon Park

Background: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy is a common surgical treatment for lumbar disc herniation, and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy (PEID) is commonly used for direct decompression of L5-S1. Like microdiscectomy, recurrence of herniation after endoscopic discectomy is an important problem. In this study, we aimed to decrease the recurrence after PEID using a new surgical technique. Objectives: We propose a new surgical technique for reducing the recurrence after PEID for lumbar disc herniation. The new technique uses annular sealing after fragmentectomy. We compared clinical results and recurrent lumbar disc herniation (had radiculopathy and confirmed by MRI) between patients who underwent surgery with and without annular sealing during PEID. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing PEID. Methods: A total of 224 patients with radiculopathy due to L5-S1 disc herniation who were treated by PEID with (91 patients) or without annular sealing (133) were included in this study. We compared the demographic characteristics (age, sex, height, weight, BMI, smoking status, and occupation), clinical results, and recurrence rates between the 2 groups. We classified recurrence according to time period (early recurrence ≤ 6 months, late recurrence > 6 months). Results: The study groups were demographically similar, and substantial improvement in clinical results was noted. There were 5 recurrences (5.5%) (2 early, 3 late recurrences) in the group with annular sealing, and 18 (13.5%) (13 early, 5 late recurrences) in the group without annular sealing. Early recurrence rates were significantly higher in the group without sealing (2 vs. 13, P = 0.029). Increasing age was associated with overall recurrence (P = 0.004) and late recurrence (P = 0.008), while operative technique correlated with early recurrence (P = 0.026). Limitations: First, this study incorporates a retrospective design. Second, the operations were performed by 2 surgeons. Additionally, this is relatively a short-term follow-up study (mean 19.5 ± 5.0 months). Conclusions: Though a learning curve is needed in order to become familiar with PEID, recurrence after PEID was associated with advanced age, and PEID with annular sealing resulted in lower early recurrence rates than without annular sealing. Thus, PEID with annular sealing may be a useful technique for reducing early recurrence. Key words: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy, interlaminar approach, fragmentectomy, recurrence


2018 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. 29-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Segura-Trepichio ◽  
Antonio Martin-Benlloch ◽  
Jose Manuel Montoza-Nuñez ◽  
David Candela-Zaplana ◽  
Andreu Nolasco

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document