An Analysis of School Leadership Preparation and Development in Namibia

Author(s):  
Carolyn (Callie) Grant
2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gladys Asuga ◽  
Scott Eacott ◽  
Jill Scevak

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the quality of the current provision for school leadership in Kenya, the extent to which they have an impact on student outcomes and the return on school leadership preparation and development investment. Design/methodology/approach – The paper draws from educational leadership, management and administration courses delivered by universities and other institutions to aspiring and practising educational leaders in Kenya. It employs a method for evaluating return on leadership development investment first articulated by Eacott (2013). Findings – While there is growth in provision, consistent with international trends, this provision is more recognised for its standardisation than points of distinction; there is minimal attention to identified dimensions of leadership leading to higher student outcomes which raises questions regarding the universality of school leadership preparation and development curriculum; and the high course costs of current provision is an inhibiting factor in assessing the return on investment in school leadership preparation and development. Research limitations/implications – The study was limited to publicly available documents from a limited sample of institutions. There is a need for more studies in the area. Practical implications – Institutions seeking to offer school leadership development have grounds on which to make decision about what programs their school leaders should undertake in terms of cost and quality. The study provides institution offering school leadership development courses evidence on which to base future policy direction. Social implications – The findings provide a case for investing in school leadership development given the impact courses may have on student outcomes. Originality/value – The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current provision on school leadership preparation and development in Kenya. It contributes to its understanding in Africa in terms of quality, performance impact and return on investment.


Author(s):  
Mohammed Abdalla ◽  
Mweru Mwingi ◽  
Nicholas Wachira ◽  
Janet Mola Okoko ◽  
Charles F. Webber

Author(s):  
Julie Anne Gray

This conceptual article proposes a research-based model for leadership preparation programs to more effectively prepare, support, and sustain new school leaders in the field and profession. This study offers a new construct, which combines the concepts of early field experiences, experiential learning, leadership-focused coaching, and mentoring support, with university faculty and school district leaders and mentors working collaboratively to support novice leaders. University faculty would provide leadership-focused coaching while prospective leaders are completing coursework and later once they are placed in school leadership positions. Further, school districts would provide mentoring support by experienced instructional leaders.


2006 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Sullivan

THIS PAPER ARGUES that, in preparing people for leadership in faith schools, attention should be paid to the differences in their purpose, nature and ethos as well as to what they have in common with all other schools. First, I suggest that leadership is essentially connected to purposes. Then I bring out some of the ways that leadership of faith schools, and more particularly, leadership of church schools, requires priorities and capacities additional to and different from those required in mainstream schools. Third, as an example of the type of separate and specific provision for church school leadership that is needed, there is a brief description of an MA programme which I directed between 1997–2002. Fourth, there is an analysis of some of the tensions and conflicts brought about by the desire of churches to have separate provision of leadership preparation opportunities. Finally, it is suggested that, although there are difficulties that arise when faith schools emphasise their distinctiveness too much, so too there are dangers when insufficient attention is paid to this distinctiveness and when other professional and educational orthodoxies are imposed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document