2006 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
RICHARD MACLURE

Multilateral donors like the World Bank and bilateral agencies such as the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the British Department for International Development exert a great deal of influence in international educational development — particularly in sub-Saharan Africa — both in the programs they fund and the types of research they engage in. In this article, Richard Maclure investigates educational research in Africa and juxtaposes research done by large, exogenous, Western, results-oriented organizations with research performed by smaller, endogenous, local researchers aided by local research networks. Maclure argues convincingly that research that falls into the exogenous "donor-control" paradigm far too often is irrelevant to the African educational policy context and does little to develop local research capacity. The cases of two African research networks — the Educational Research Network of West and Central Africa and the Association for the Development of Education in Africa—are presented as exemplars of organizations that promote an alternative type of research that is endogenous, relevant to policy and the process of policymaking, and controlled by Africans. Maclure concludes with a call for increased support for and development of these types of networks, and for the development of the long-term solution to educational research in Africa — the university.


2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine D. Bruce ◽  
Brent Davis ◽  
Nathalie Sinclair ◽  
Lynn McGarvey ◽  
David Hallowell ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 65-84
Author(s):  
Cătălina Ulrich

This article reports an analysis on methodological and thematic trends in the field of educational research. The introduction presents main challenges regarding recent insights and pressure for research in universities as well as main objectives. Theoretical framework section reflects actual debates regarding educational research within the social science area and under pressure of public accountability and funding in European Union universities and US. Next section describes data sources and processing, using mainly content analysis on three largest research networks: AERA (founded in 1916), EERA (founded in 1994) and WERA (founded in 2009). Comparative analysis provides interesting information regarding the history, missions, priorities, principles and regulations on carrying educational research. One the one hand, there are noticeable differences in time gap, practice-orientation, social responsibility and funding policies for university research in Europe and US. On the other hand, EU's struggle in competition with US puts pressure on education researchers; university ranking and impact evaluation are seen as external and mainly originated in US tradition. Findings about the dynamics of research networks, problem-driven and contextual sensitive approach, integrated research endeavour (inter and trans-disciplinary), teams flexibility and emerging interests could have a double impact. It could inspire ongoing efforts of redesigning the doctoral studies programs at the University of Bucharest and also the PhD students' identity and career building occurring in real institutions and academic sphere.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 65-84
Author(s):  
Cătălina Ulrich

This article reports an analysis on methodological and thematic trends in the field of educational research. The introduction presents main challenges regarding recent insights and pressure for research in universities as well as main objectives. Theoretical framework section reflects actual debates regarding educational research within the social science area and under pressure of public accountability and funding in European Union universities and US. Next section describes data sources and processing, using mainly content analysis on three largest research networks: AERA (founded in 1916), EERA (founded in 1994) and WERA (founded in 2009). Comparative analysis provides interesting information regarding the history, missions, priorities, principles and regulations on carrying educational research. One the one hand, there are noticeable differences in time gap, practice-orientation, social responsibility and funding policies for university research in Europe and US. On the other hand, EU's struggle in competition with US puts pressure on education researchers; university ranking and impact evaluation are seen as external and mainly originated in US tradition. Findings about the dynamics of research networks, problem-driven and contextual sensitive approach, integrated research endeavour (inter and trans-disciplinary), teams flexibility and emerging interests could have a double impact. It could inspire ongoing efforts of redesigning the doctoral studies programs at the University of Bucharest and also the PhD students' identity and career building occurring in real institutions and academic sphere.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document