An improved regional flood frequency analysis approach at the global scale

Author(s):  
Gang Zhao ◽  
Paul Bates ◽  
Jeff Neal ◽  
Bo Pang

<p>Design flood estimation in data-poor regions is a fundamental task in hydrology. In this paper, we propose a regional flood frequency analysis approach to estimate design floods anywhere on the global river network. This approach involves two stages: (i) clustering global gauging stations into subareas by a K-means model based on twelve globally available catchment descriptors and (ii) developing a regression model in each subarea for design flood estimation using the same descriptors. Nearly 12,000 discharge stations globally were selected for model development and a benchmark global index-flood method was adopted for comparison. The results showed that: (1) the proposed approach achieved the highest accuracy for design flood estimation when using all catchment descriptors for clustering; and the regression model accuracy improved by considering more descriptors in model development; (2) a support vector machine regression showed the highest accuracy among all regression models tested, with relative root mean squared error of 0.67 for mean flood and 0.83 for 100-year return period flood estimations; (3) 100-year return period flood magnitude in tropical, arid, temperate, continental and polar climate zones could be reliably estimated with relative mean biases of -0.18, -0.23, -0.18, 0.17 and -0.11 respectively by adopting a 5-fold cross-validation procedure; (4) the proposed approach outperformed the benchmark index-flood method for 10, 50 and 100 year return period estimates; We conclude that the proposed RFFA is a valid approach to generate design floods globally, improving our understanding of the flood hazard, especially in ungauged areas.</p>

Water Resources decision making problems such as flood plain zoning, design of hydraulic structures etc. are based on design flood estimate, defined as discharge for a specified probability of exceedance. Flood Frequency Analysis helps to estimate the flood value for a specific return period. This procedure requires sufficient length of observed data of floods on river gauging sites which many a time is not available. In India major rivers have very few gauging sites and their tributaries are mostly ungauged. When quantiles have to be estimated for ungauged sites, Flood Frequency Analysis is neither possible nor reliable. Regional Flood Frequency Analysis is the means to overcome such problems, reasonably quantifying flood estimates at desired frequencies for sites within a more or less hydrological homogeneous region. Narmada Basin located in central India covers an area about 98,976 sq. km, drained by a large number of tributaries, most of which are ungauged, has been considered as the case. Index Flood method utilizing Gumbel’s EV-1 distribution have been used in the present study to develop the Regional flood frequency relationship. The Annual Peak Flood data of 16 gauging sites of Narmada Basin, having record length of 12 to 17 years, is utilized for flood estimation. Flood frequency curves for the considered gauging stations are generated. Development of regional flood frequency relationship leads to the estimation of different return period flood.


Water SA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (3 July) ◽  
Author(s):  
JJ Nathanael ◽  
JC Smithers ◽  
MJC Horan

In engineering and flood hydrology, the estimation of a design flood associates the magnitude of a flood with a level of exceedance, or return period, for a given site. The use of a regional flood frequency analysis (RFFA) approach improves the accuracy and reliability of estimates of design floods. However, no RFFA method is currently widely used in South Africa, despite a number of RFFA studies having been undertaken in Africa and which include South Africa in their study areas. Hence, the performance of the current RFFA approaches needs to be assessed in order to determine the best approaches to use and to determine if a new RFFA approach needs to be developed for use in South Africa. Through a review of the relevant literature it was found that the Meigh et al. (1997) method, the Mkhandi et al. (2000) method, the Görgens (2007) Joint Peak-Volume (JPV) method and the Haile (2011) method are available for application in a nationwide study. The results of the study show that the Haile method generally performs better than the other RFFA methods; however, it also consistently underestimates design floods. Due to the poor overall performance of the RFFA methods assessed, it is recommended that a new RFFA method be developed for application in design flood practice in South Africa.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document