regional frequency
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

243
(FIVE YEARS 55)

H-INDEX

29
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2022 ◽  
Vol 518 ◽  
pp. 230773
Author(s):  
Shaotang Huang ◽  
Cuicui Liu ◽  
Huiqin Sun ◽  
Qiangqiang Liao

MAUSAM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 835-846
Author(s):  
MOHIT NAIN ◽  
B. K. HOODA

This paper is sets-out for the regional frequency analysis of daily maximum rainfall from the 27 rain gauge stations in Haryana using L-moments. As the distribution of rainfall varies spatially in Haryana, the 27 rain gauge stations are grouped into three clusters namely, cluster C1, C2 and C3 using Ward’s clustering method and homogeneity of clusters was confirmed using L-moments-based Heterogeneity measure (H). Using goodness-of-fit measure ( DIST Z ) and L-moment ratios diagram, suitable regional frequency distributions were selected among five candidate distributions;Generalized Logistic (GLO), Generalized Extreme Value (GEV),Generalized Normal (GNO), Generalized Pareto (GPA), and Pearson Type-3 (PE3) for each cluster. Results showed that PE3 and GNO were good fitted regional distribution for the cluster C1 and GEV, PE3 and GNO fitted for cluster C2 while for cluster C3; GLO and GEV were good fitted regional distribution. To select a robust distribution among good fitted distributions accuracy measures calculated using Monte Carlo simulations for each cluster. The simulation result showed that PE3 was the best choice for quantile estimation for cluster C1. For cluster C2, PE3 was the best choicefor a large return period and GEV was best for a small return period. For cluster C3, GEV was the most suitable distribution for quantile estimation. Using these robust distributions rainfall quantiles were estimated at each rain gauge station from 2 to 100 year return periods. These estimated rainfall quantiles may be rough guideline for planning and designing hydraulic structures by policy makers and structural engineers.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 1817-1835
Author(s):  
Nilotpal Debbarma ◽  
Parthasarathi Choudhury ◽  
Parthajit Roy ◽  
Shivam Agarwal

Estimation of rainfall quantile is an important step in regional frequency analysis for planning and design of any water resources project. Related evaluations of accuracy and uncertainty help to further assist in enhancing the reliability of design estimates. In this study, therefore, we investigate the accuracy and uncertainty of regional frequency analysis of extreme rainfall computed from genetic algorithm-based clustering. Uncertainty assessment is explored with prediction of quantiles with a new spatial Information Transfer Index (ITI) and Monte Carlo simulation framework. And, accuracy assessment is done with the comparison of regional growth curves to at-site analysis for each homogenous region. Further, uncertainty assessment with the ITI method is compared with Maximum Likelihood estimation (MLE) optimized by a genetic algorithm (GA) to check the suitability of the method. Results obtained suggest the ITI-based uncertainty assessment for regional estimates outperformed those of at-site estimates. The MLE-GA method based on at-site estimates was found to be better than at-site estimates based on L-moments, suggesting the former as a better alternative to compare with regional frequency estimates. Moreover, minimal bias and least deviation of the regional growth curve were obtained in the rainfall regions. The confidence intervals of regional estimates were seen to be well within the bounds of normality assumptions. Doi: 10.28991/cej-2021-03091762 Full Text: PDF


MAUSAM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 835-846
Author(s):  
MOHIT NAIN ◽  
B. K. HOODA

This paper is sets-out for the regional frequency analysis of daily maximum rainfall from the 27 rain gauge stations in Haryana using L-moments. As the distribution of rainfall varies spatially in Haryana, the 27 rain gauge stations are grouped into three clusters namely, cluster C1, C2 and C3 using Ward’s clustering method and homogeneity of clusters was confirmed using L-moments-based Heterogeneity measure (H). Using goodness-of-fit measure (  ) and L-moment ratios diagram, suitable regional frequency distributions were selected among five candidate distributions; Generalized Logistic (GLO), Generalized Extreme Value (GEV),Generalized Normal (GNO), Generalized Pareto (GPA), and Pearson Type-3 (PE3) for each cluster. Results showed that PE3 and GNO were good fitted regional distribution for the cluster C1 and GEV, PE3 and GNO fitted for cluster C2 while for cluster C3; GLO and GEV were good fitted regional distribution. To select a robust distribution among good fitted distributions accuracy measures calculated using Monte Carlo simulations for each cluster. The simulation result showed that PE3 was the best choice for quantile estimation for cluster C1. For cluster C2, PE3 was the best choicefor a large return period and GEV was best for a small return period. For cluster C3, GEV was the most suitable distribution for quantile estimation. Using these robust distributions rainfall quantiles were estimated at each rain gauge station from 2 to 100 year return periods. These estimated rainfall quantiles may be rough guideline for planning and designing hydraulic structures by policy makers and structural engineers.


Author(s):  
Simon Ricard ◽  
Alexis Bédard-Therrien ◽  
Annie-Claude ACP Parent ◽  
Brian Morse ◽  
François Anctil

A flood frequency analysis is conducted using instantaneous peak flow data over a hydrologic sub-region of southern Québec following three distinct methodological frameworks. First, the analysis is conducted locally using available instantaneous peak flow data. Second, the analysis is conducted locally using daily peak flow data processed in order to consider the peak flow effect. Third, a regional frequency analysis is conducted pooling all available instantaneous peak flow data over the study area. Results reveal a notable diversity in the resulting recurrence peak flow estimates and related uncertainties from one analysis to another. Expert judgement appears essential to arbitrate which alternative should be operated considering a specific context of application for flood plain delineation. Pros and cons for each approach are discussed. We finally encourage the use of a diversity of approaches in order to provide a robust assessment of uncertainty affecting peak flow estimates.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Jeonghoon Lee ◽  
Jeongeun Won ◽  
Jeonghyeon Choi ◽  
Sangda Kim

Frequency analysis of the annual maximum rainfall time series is essential for designing infrastructures to provide protection against local floods and related events. However, the results of the frequency analysis obtained are ambiguous. In this study, we aimed to develop a spatial hierarchical Bayesian model framework through combining the climatic and topographic information. To confirm the applicability of the proposed method, the results of at-site frequency analysis and regional frequency analysis using the index flood method were compared in the Busan-Ulsan-Gyeongnam region. Furthermore, a hierarchical Bayesian model was developed, in which the parameters of the generalized logistic distribution comprised relatively simple covariate relationships upon considering the possibility of expansion into various probability distributions and more complex covariate structures. The uncertainty of this model was analyzed using the coefficient of variation of rainfall quantile ensemble. The results confirmed that the regional frequency analysis using the hierarchical Bayesian model combined with the climatic and topographic information could provide an accurate estimate of extreme daily rainfall with relatively good agreement with the estimate at a specific site, but is a more reliable approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document