Optic Disc Pit Maculopathy after Prone Positioning Spine Surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. e144-e146
Author(s):  
Marcos Ruiz-Sánchez ◽  
Maria E. Rodríguez-González-Herrero ◽  
Jenifer Ruiz-Sará

Purpose To report a case of optic disc pit maculopathy after spine surgery performed in the prone position. Methods Case report. Results A 32-year-old man underwent spine surgery for disc herniation repair. He complained of visual acuity loss immediately after the procedure. Optic disc maculopathy with internal limiting membrane detachment was found to be the cause. Vitrectomy was scheduled after a 12-month follow-up without resolution of the maculopathy. Conclusions Optic disc maculopathy has not previously been associated with nonocular surgery or patient positioning. Physiologic changes induced by the prone position likely altered the pressure gradient in the eye and led to the development of the maculopathy.

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110237
Author(s):  
Ilkay Kilic Muftuoglu ◽  
Ecem Onder Tokuc ◽  
V Levent Karabas

Purpose: To report outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with internal limiting membrane (ILM) stuffing technique in patients with optic disc pit associated maculopathy (ODP-M). Methods: Data including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), foveal center point thickness (FCP), and maximum height of fluid (max_fluid) (intraretinal or subretinal) were collected from the medical records of the patients. Results: Six eyes of six patients with a mean age of 28.0 ± 17.68 years (range: 9–53 year) underwent PPV + ILM plug surgery. The mean follow-up duration was 25.62 ± 26.11 months (range: 11.80–78.00 month) duration. The mean BCVA increased from 1.25 ± 1.04 logMAR (20/355, Snellen equivalent) to 0.86 ± 1.09 logMAR (20/144, Snellen equivalent) at last follow-up ( p = 0.043). Compared to baseline, CMT, FCP, and max_fluid significantly decreased at all visits after the surgery ( p < 0.05 for all visits). At last follow-up, 66.6% of the eyes (four eyes) showed complete resolution of fluid at a mean of 5.25 ± 4.99 months (range: 1–12 months) after the surgery. Conclusion: PPV with ILM plug seemed to be an effective surgical technique in ODP-M. Studies with longer follow-up and higher number of patients are needed to confirm our results.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-204
Author(s):  
Emilio Rapizzi ◽  
Paola Gallon ◽  
Diego Ponzin ◽  
Stefano Ferrari ◽  
Nicola Zemella

The purpose of this report is to present the outcomes of surgical interventions in 4 patients with maculopathy associated with optic disc pit (ODP). We report 4 cases of patients affected by ODP maculopathy and treated by core vitrectomy with induction of posterior vitreous detachment and peeling of the internal limiting membrane restricted to the interpapillary macular zone without laser treatment and gas tamponade. The patients had rapid resolution of the multilayer inner retinoschisis-like separation and progressive slow reabsorption of the macular intraretinal and subretinal fluid up to complete retinal reattachment. Currently, there are still no widely accepted guidelines related to the best technique in the management of the maculopathy associated with ODP. We used a conservative approach, without the adoption of intravitreal gas injection or laser.


2020 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2019-315075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naresh Babu ◽  
Piyush Kohli ◽  
Kim Ramasamy

AimTo compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling alone versus inverted ILM flap to plug the pit versus autologous scleral plug for the treatment of optic disc pit maculopathy (ODP-M).MethodsThis retrospective study included 23 patients (23 eyes) who underwent 25G pars plana vitrectomy, ILM peeling and gas tamponade. While the pit was not plugged in group 1 (n=8), inverted ILM flap and autologous scleral flap were used to plug the pit in group 2 (n=7) and group 3 (n=8), respectively. Complete anatomical success was defined as total resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) and macular schisis on optical coherence tomography while visual success was defined as a gain of at least 2 Snellen lines 1 year after surgery.ResultsBaseline characteristics were similar in all three groups. Mean central foveal thickness and SRF decreased in all three groups (p<0.05). Complete anatomical success was achieved in 25.0%, 85.7% and 87.5% eyes while visual success was achieved in 12.5%, 28.6% and 12.5% eyes in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. One eye (4.3%) in group 2 developed full-thickness macular hole at 1 month post-surgery. After complete resolution, there was no recurrence of fluid.ConclusionOPD-M has a better surgical outcome if the pit is plugged. Both inverted ILM flap and autologous scleral plug are equally efficacious adjuncts to plug the pit.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Tavallali ◽  
Yasaman Sadeghi ◽  
Seyed-Hossein Abtahi ◽  
Hosein Nouri ◽  
Mitra Rezaei ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To present the outcome of optic disc pit maculopathy (ODPM) managed successfully with inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap over the optic disc. Methods This prospective case series included three patients with ODPM who underwent pars plana vitrectomy with posterior vitreous detachment induction, followed by inverted ILM flap over the optic disc and gas tamponade. Patients were followed for 7-16 weeks as regards their functional and anatomical findings. A narrative review is also provided about Pathology, Pathogenesis, and surgical techniques in the treatment of ODPM Results Three adult patients (25–39 years old) were evaluated, with a mean duration of decreased visual acuity of 7.33 ± 2.40 months (4-12 months). Postoperatively, BCVA improved dramatically in one patient from 2/200 to 20/25. BCVA in the other two improved two and three lines, to 20/50 and 20/30, respectively. Significant anatomic improvement was achieved in all patients. Conclusion Vitrectomy with inverted ILM flap insertion over the optic disc can yield favorable anatomical improvement in patients with ODPM.


2018 ◽  
Vol 256 (4) ◽  
pp. 675-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferdinando Bottoni ◽  
Matteo Cereda ◽  
Roberta Secondi ◽  
Sara Bochicchio ◽  
Giovanni Staurenghi

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (12) ◽  
pp. e271-e277 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. P. Almeida ◽  
Eric K. Chin ◽  
Parnian Arjmand ◽  
Gabriel Velez ◽  
Lucy P. Evans ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document