scholarly journals Great differences in performance and outcome of high-throughput sequencing data analysis platforms for fungal metabarcoding

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sten Anslan ◽  
Henrik Nilsson ◽  
Christian Wurzbacher ◽  
Petr Baldrian ◽  
Leho Tedersoo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Throughput ◽  
High Throughput Sequencing ◽  
Computation Time ◽  
Potential Effect ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Operational Taxonomic Units ◽  
High Throughput Sequencing Data ◽  
Recent Developments

Along with recent developments in high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies and thus fast accumulation of HTS data, there has been a growing need and interest for developing tools for HTS data processing and communication. In particular, a number of bioinformatics tools have been designed for analysing metabarcoding data, each with specific features, assumptions and outputs. To evaluate the potential effect of the application of different bioinformatics workflow on the results, we compared the performance of different analysis platforms on two contrasting high-throughput sequencing data sets. Our analysis revealed that the computation time, quality of error filtering and hence output of specific bioinformatics process largely depends on the platform used. Our results show that none of the bioinformatics workflows appear to perfectly filter out the accumulated errors and generate Operational Taxonomic Units, although PipeCraft, LotuS and PIPITS perform better than QIIME2 and Galaxy for the tested fungal amplicon data set. We conclude that the output of each platform require manual validation of the OTUs by examining the taxonomy assignment values.

scholarly journals Great differences in performance and outcome of high-throughput sequencing data analysis platforms for fungal metabarcoding

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sten Anslan ◽  
Henrik Nilsson ◽  
Christian Wurzbacher ◽  
Petr Baldrian ◽  
Leho Tedersoo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Throughput ◽  
High Throughput Sequencing ◽  
Computation Time ◽  
Potential Effect ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Operational Taxonomic Units ◽  
High Throughput Sequencing Data ◽  
Recent Developments

Along with recent developments in high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies and thus fast accumulation of HTS data, there has been a growing need and interest for developing tools for HTS data processing and communication. In particular, a number of bioinformatics tools have been designed for analysing metabarcoding data, each with specific features, assumptions and outputs. To evaluate the potential effect of the application of different bioinformatics workflow on the results, we compared the performance of different analysis platforms on two contrasting high-throughput sequencing data sets. Our analysis revealed that the computation time, quality of error filtering and hence output of specific bioinformatics process largely depends on the platform used. Our results show that none of the bioinformatics workflows appear to perfectly filter out the accumulated errors and generate Operational Taxonomic Units, although PipeCraft, LotuS and PIPITS perform better than QIIME2 and Galaxy for the tested fungal amplicon data set. We conclude that the output of each platform require manual validation of the OTUs by examining the taxonomy assignment values.

scholarly journals Great differences in performance and outcome of high-throughput sequencing data analysis platforms for fungal metabarcoding

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sten Anslan ◽  
Henrik Nilsson ◽  
Christian Wurzbacher ◽  
Petr Baldrian ◽  
Leho Tedersoo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Throughput ◽  
High Throughput Sequencing ◽  
Computation Time ◽  
Potential Effect ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Operational Taxonomic Units ◽  
High Throughput Sequencing Data ◽  
Recent Developments

Along with recent developments in high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies and thus fast accumulation of HTS data, there has been a growing need and interest for developing tools for HTS data processing and communication. In particular, a number of bioinformatics tools have been designed for analysing metabarcoding data, each with specific features, assumptions and outputs. To evaluate the potential effect of the application of different bioinformatics workflow on the results, we compared the performance of different analysis platforms on two contrasting high-throughput sequencing data sets. Our analysis revealed that the computation time, quality of error filtering and hence output of specific bioinformatics process largely depends on the platform used. Our results show that none of the bioinformatics workflows appear to perfectly filter out the accumulated errors and generate Operational Taxonomic Units, although PipeCraft, LotuS and PIPITS perform better than QIIME2 and Galaxy for the tested fungal amplicon data set. We conclude that the output of each platform require manual validation of the OTUs by examining the taxonomy assignment values.

scholarly journals Great differences in performance and outcome of high-throughput sequencing data analysis platforms for fungal metabarcoding

MycoKeys ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 29-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sten Anslan ◽  
R. Henrik Nilsson ◽  
Christian Wurzbacher ◽  
Petr Baldrian ◽  
Leho Tedersoo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Throughput ◽  
High Throughput Sequencing ◽  
Computation Time ◽  
Potential Effect ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Operational Taxonomic Units ◽  
High Throughput Sequencing Data ◽  
Recent Developments

Along with recent developments in high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies and thus fast accumulation of HTS data, there has been a growing need and interest for developing tools for HTS data processing and communication. In particular, a number of bioinformatics tools have been designed for analysing metabarcoding data, each with specific features, assumptions and outputs. To evaluate the potential effect of the application of different bioinformatics workflow on the results, we compared the performance of different analysis platforms on two contrasting high-throughput sequencing data sets. Our analysis revealed that the computation time, quality of error filtering and hence output of specific bioinformatics process largely depends on the platform used. Our results show that none of the bioinformatics workflows appears to perfectly filter out the accumulated errors and generate Operational Taxonomic Units, although PipeCraft, LotuS and PIPITS perform better than QIIME2 and Galaxy for the tested fungal amplicon dataset. We conclude that the output of each platform requires manual validation of the OTUs by examining the taxonomy assignment values.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Subsampling-Based Normalization Strategies for Tagged High-Throughput Sequencing Data Sets from Gut Microbiomes

2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (24) ◽  
pp. 8795-8798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Aguirre de Cárcer ◽  
Stuart E. Denman ◽  
Chris McSweeney ◽  
Mark Morrison
Keyword(s):  
High Throughput ◽  
High Throughput Sequencing ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Β Diversity ◽  
High Throughput Sequencing Data ◽  
Minimum Number ◽  
Diversity Metrics

ABSTRACTSeveral subsampling-based normalization strategies were applied to different high-throughput sequencing data sets originating from human and murine gut environments. Their effects on the data sets' characteristics and normalization efficiencies, as measured by several β-diversity metrics, were compared. For both data sets, subsampling to the median rather than the minimum number appeared to improve the analysis.

scholarly journals PathoQC: Computationally Efficient Read Preprocessing and Quality Control for High-Throughput Sequencing Data Sets

2014 ◽  
Vol 13s1 ◽  
pp. CIN.S13890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changjin Hong ◽  
Solaiappan Manimaran ◽  
William Evan Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Quality Control ◽  
High Throughput ◽  
High Performance ◽  
High Throughput Sequencing ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Data ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Computationally Efficient ◽  
High Throughput Sequencing Data ◽  
Downstream Analysis

Quality control and read preprocessing are critical steps in the analysis of data sets generated from high-throughput genomic screens. In the most extreme cases, improper preprocessing can negatively affect downstream analyses and may lead to incorrect biological conclusions. Here, we present PathoQC, a streamlined toolkit that seamlessly combines the benefits of several popular quality control software approaches for preprocessing next-generation sequencing data. PathoQC provides a variety of quality control options appropriate for most high-throughput sequencing applications. PathoQC is primarily developed as a module in the PathoScope software suite for metagenomic analysis. However, PathoQC is also available as an open-source Python module that can run as a stand-alone application or can be easily integrated into any bioinformatics workflow. PathoQC achieves high performance by supporting parallel computation and is an effective tool that removes technical sequencing artifacts and facilitates robust downstream analysis. The PathoQC software package is available at http://sourceforge.net/projects/PathoScope/ .

scholarly journals OGRE: Overlap Graph-based metagenomic Read clustEring

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marleen Balvert ◽  
Xiao Luo ◽  
Ernestina Hauptfeld ◽  
Alexander Schönhuth ◽  
Bas E Dutilh
Keyword(s):  
High Throughput ◽  
High Throughput Sequencing ◽  
Computation Time ◽  
Supplementary Information ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
High Throughput Sequencing Data ◽  
Computationally Intensive ◽  
Metagenome Sequencing ◽  
Species Specific ◽  
Cluster Purity

Abstract Motivation The microbes that live in an environment can be identified from the combined genomic material, also referred to as the metagenome. Sequencing a metagenome can result in large volumes of sequencing reads. A promising approach to reduce the size of metagenomic datasets is by clustering reads into groups based on their overlaps. Clustering reads are valuable to facilitate downstream analyses, including computationally intensive strain-aware assembly. As current read clustering approaches cannot handle the large datasets arising from high-throughput metagenome sequencing, a novel read clustering approach is needed. In this article, we propose OGRE, an Overlap Graph-based Read clustEring procedure for high-throughput sequencing data, with a focus on shotgun metagenomes. Results We show that for small datasets OGRE outperforms other read binners in terms of the number of species included in a cluster, also referred to as cluster purity, and the fraction of all reads that is placed in one of the clusters. Furthermore, OGRE is able to process metagenomic datasets that are too large for other read binners into clusters with high cluster purity. Conclusion OGRE is the only method that can successfully cluster reads in species-specific clusters for large metagenomic datasets without running into computation time- or memory issues. Availabilityand implementation Code is made available on Github (https://github.com/Marleen1/OGRE). Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document