scholarly journals Thinking Like a Writer: Threshold Concepts and First-Year Writers in Open- Admissions Classrooms

Author(s):  
Cassandra Phillips ◽  
Holly Hassel ◽  
Jennifer Heinert ◽  
Joanne Baird Giordano ◽  
Katie Kalish
1976 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 315
Author(s):  
Caroline Hodges Persell ◽  
Jack E. Rossmann ◽  
Helen S. Astin ◽  
Alexander W. Astin ◽  
Elaine H. El-Khawas
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  

Author(s):  
Jerry Stinnett

In many ways, the transformative character of developing critical consciousness reflects the dynamics of acquiring threshold concepts. Drawing from research into threshold concept acquisition, the author argues that critical first-year composition instruction can more effectively scaffold students into critical perspectives by linking critical pedagogy more closely with efforts to develop students’ rhetorical meta-awareness of writing.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (SI) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shalini Dukhan ◽  

Constructive alignment focuses on alignment between curriculum, learning outcomes, teaching activities, and assessment. This study argues that for lecturers to set intended learner-centred outcomes, they need insight into students’ prior knowledge of a discipline’s threshold concepts. Little is known about how a syllabus’s assumptions of prior knowledge match up to what first- year students know. Yet this insight is necessary; new knowledge is built on existing knowledge, and learning is about moving to higher cognitive levels. To gain this insight, at the start of the 2018 academic year, 292 first year biology students voluntarily answered two formative, online multiple-choice assessments on DNA and RNA synthesis. The responses showcased their knowledge gaps versus what the syllabus expected. Data analysis of their responses was used to shape teaching activities. This study extends constructive alignment by showing how quality teaching in content-dense disciplines such as biology further requires that lecturers gauge students’ prior knowledge.


Author(s):  
Jason Grove ◽  
Marios Ioannidis ◽  
Derek Wright

 Abstract – We describe the chemical engineering knowledge base in terms of five distinct concept domains: i) mathematics and computation, ii) conservation, iii) equilibrium and spontaneity, iv) rates, and v) the structure and property of materials. These concept domains underpin the curriculum and evolve from disparate subject domains presented in the first year into a cohesive whole by graduation. The knowledge base for chemical engineering can thus be expressed in terms of achieving threshold concepts related to each of these domains. This formulation of the knowledge base suggests that it may be examined using concept inventory testing. We provide examples of how such testing can be implemented in order to produce meaningful data on students’ level of concept attainment. We believe that this approach may be of interest to others as a robust and sustainable method for the ongoing assessment of CEAB Graduate Attribute 1.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document