scholarly journals Author response: Peripheral sensory coding through oscillatory synchrony in weakly electric fish

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christa A Baker ◽  
Kevin R Huck ◽  
Bruce A Carlson
eLife ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Vélez ◽  
Bruce A Carlson

Recently, we reported evidence for a novel mechanism of peripheral sensory coding based on oscillatory synchrony. Spontaneously oscillating electroreceptors in weakly electric fish (Mormyridae) respond to electrosensory stimuli with a phase reset that results in transient synchrony across the receptor population (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Baker et al., 2015</xref>). Here, we asked whether the central electrosensory system actually detects the occurrence of synchronous oscillations among receptors. We found that electrosensory stimulation elicited evoked potentials in the midbrain exterolateral nucleus at a short latency following receptor synchronization. Frequency tuning in the midbrain resembled peripheral frequency tuning, which matches the intrinsic oscillation frequencies of the receptors. These frequencies are lower than those in individual conspecific signals, and instead match those found in collective signals produced by groups of conspecifics. Our results provide further support for a novel mechanism for sensory coding based on the detection of oscillatory synchrony among peripheral receptors.


1977 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-158
Author(s):  
A. S. Feng ◽  
T. H. Bullock

The peripheral sensory basis for object discrimination was investigated in the weakly electric fish Eigenmannia virescens. Single unit recordings were made from the primary afferent fibres in the posterior branch of the anterior lateral line nerve while the local electric field (self-generated and stimulated) was modified by external resistance and capacitance shunts. Both fibre types (probability and phase coders) responded differentially to capacitance and resistance shunts of equivalent impedence. The degree of response differentiation between the two shunting conditions varied with the intensity of the electrical stimulus at the receptor. These data suggest that the primary electroreceptors can discriminatively encode the two electrical characteristics of ‘objects’. However, since the response of primary electroreceptors also varied with the spatial orientation of the shunting electrodes, central structures must play an important role in object discrimination.


eLife ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christa A Baker ◽  
Kevin R Huck ◽  
Bruce A Carlson

Adaptations to an organism's environment often involve sensory system modifications. In this study, we address how evolutionary divergence in sensory perception relates to the physiological coding of stimuli. Mormyrid fishes that can detect subtle variations in electric communication signals encode signal waveform into spike-timing differences between sensory receptors. In contrast, the receptors of species insensitive to waveform variation produce spontaneously oscillating potentials. We found that oscillating receptors respond to electric pulses by resetting their phase, resulting in transient synchrony among receptors that encodes signal timing and location, but not waveform. These receptors were most sensitive to frequencies found only in the collective signals of groups of conspecifics, and this was correlated with increased behavioral responses to these frequencies. Thus, different perceptual capabilities correspond to different receptor physiologies. We hypothesize that these divergent mechanisms represent adaptations for different social environments. Our findings provide the first evidence for sensory coding through oscillatory synchrony.


2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (6) ◽  
pp. 3102-3118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Vonderschen ◽  
Maurice J. Chacron

While peripheral sensory neurons respond to natural stimuli with a broad range of spatiotemporal frequencies, central neurons instead respond sparsely to specific features in general. The nonlinear transformations leading to this emergent selectivity are not well understood. Here we characterized how the neural representation of stimuli changes across successive brain areas, using the electrosensory system of weakly electric fish as a model system. We found that midbrain torus semicircularis (TS) neurons were on average more selective in their responses than hindbrain electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELL) neurons. Further analysis revealed two categories of TS neurons: dense coding TS neurons that were ELL-like and sparse coding TS neurons that displayed selective responses. These neurons in general responded to preferred stimuli with few spikes and were mostly silent for other stimuli. We further investigated whether information about stimulus attributes was contained in the activities of ELL and TS neurons. To do so, we used a spike train metric to quantify how well stimuli could be discriminated based on spiking responses. We found that sparse coding TS neurons performed poorly even when their activities were combined compared with ELL and dense coding TS neurons. In contrast, combining the activities of as few as 12 dense coding TS neurons could lead to optimal discrimination. On the other hand, sparse coding TS neurons were better detectors of whether their preferred stimulus occurred compared with either dense coding TS or ELL neurons. Our results therefore suggest that the TS implements parallel detection and estimation of sensory input.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document