scholarly journals Correction of amblyopia in cats and mice after the critical period

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-fai Fong ◽  
Kevin R Duffy ◽  
Madison P Leet ◽  
Christian T Candler ◽  
Mark F Bear
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Visual Impairment ◽  
Primary Visual Cortex ◽  
Critical Period ◽  
Alternative Explanation ◽  
Monocular Deprivation ◽  
Interocular Suppression ◽  
Fellow Eye ◽  
Clinical Observations

Monocular deprivation early in development causes amblyopia, a severe visual impairment. Prognosis is poor if therapy is initiated after an early critical period. However, clinical observations have shown that recovery from amblyopia can occur later in life when the non-deprived (fellow) eye is removed. The traditional interpretation of this finding is that vision is improved simply by the elimination of interocular suppression in primary visual cortex, revealing responses to previously subthreshold input. However, an alternative explanation is that silencing activity in the fellow eye establishes conditions in visual cortex that enable the weak connections from the amblyopic eye to gain strength, in which case the recovery would persist even if vision is restored in the fellow eye. Consistent with this idea, we show here in cats and mice that temporary inactivation of the fellow eye is sufficient to promote a full and enduring recovery from amblyopia at ages when conventional treatments fail. Thus, connections serving the amblyopic eye are capable of substantial plasticity beyond the critical period, and this potential is unleashed by reversibly silencing the fellow eye.

scholarly journals Correction of amblyopia in cats and mice after the critical period

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-fai Fong ◽  
Kevin R. Duffy ◽  
Madison P. Leet ◽  
Christian T. Candler ◽  
Mark F. Bear
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Visual Impairment ◽  
Primary Visual Cortex ◽  
Critical Period ◽  
Alternative Explanation ◽  
Monocular Deprivation ◽  
Interocular Suppression ◽  
Fellow Eye ◽  
Clinical Observations

Monocular deprivation early in development causes amblyopia, a severe visual impairment. Prognosis is poor if therapy is initiated after an early critical period. However, clinical observations have shown that recovery from amblyopia can occur later in life when the non-deprived (fellow) eye is removed. The traditional interpretation of this finding is that vision is improved by relieving interocular suppression in primary visual cortex. However, an alternative explanation is that elimination of activity in the fellow eye establishes conditions in visual cortex that enable the weak connections from the amblyopic eye to gain strength. Here we show in cats and mice that temporary inactivation of the fellow eye is sufficient to promote a full and enduring recovery from amblyopia at ages when conventional treatments fail. Thus, connections serving the amblyopic eye are capable of substantial plasticity beyond the critical period, and this potential is unleashed by reversibly silencing the fellow eye.

scholarly journals Activation of NMDA Receptors Is Necessary for the Recovery of Cortical Binocularity

2010 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
pp. 2700-2706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Krahe ◽  
Alexandre E. Medina
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Primary Visual Cortex ◽  
Binocular Vision ◽  
Critical Period ◽  
Functional Change ◽  
Monocular Deprivation ◽  
Extracellular Recordings ◽  
Aspartate Receptor ◽  
Critical Period Of Development

Classic experiments have indicated that monocular deprivation (MD) for a few days during a critical period of development results in a decrease in the strength of connections mediating responses to the deprived eye, leading to a dramatic breakdown of cortical neuron binocularity. Despite the substantial functional change in the visual cortex, recovery from the effects of MD can be obtained if binocular vision is promptly restored. While great efforts have been made to elucidate the mechanisms regulating loss of deprived eye function, the mechanisms that underlie the recovery of cortical binocularity are poorly understood. Here, we examined whether activation of the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) is required for the recovery of cortical binocularity by pharmacologically blocking the NMDAR using d,l-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic (APV). Ferrets ( n = 10) were monocularly deprived for 6 days, and osmotic minipumps, filled with APV (5.6 mg/ml) or saline, were surgically implanted into the primary visual cortex. One day after surgery, the deprived eye was reopened, and the animals were allowed 24 h of binocular vision. Extracellular recordings showed that intracortical infusion of the NMDAR antagonist, APV, prevented recovery of cortical binocularity while preserving neuronal responsiveness. These findings provide an important new insight for a specific role of NMDARs in the recovery of cortical binocularity from the effects of MD.

scholarly journals Experience-dependent structural plasticity at pre- and postsynaptic sites of layer 2/3 cells in developing visual cortex

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yujiao Jennifer Sun ◽  
J. Sebastian Espinosa ◽  
Mahmood S. Hoseini ◽  
Michael P. Stryker
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Primary Visual Cortex ◽  
Critical Period ◽  
Visual Experience ◽  
Visual Deprivation ◽  
Monocular Deprivation ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Dependent Plasticity ◽  
Anatomical Changes ◽  
Layer 2

AbstractThe developing brain can respond quickly to altered sensory experience by circuit reorganization. During a critical period in early life, neurons in the primary visual cortex rapidly lose responsiveness to an occluded eye and come to respond better to the open eye. While physiological and some of the molecular mechanisms of this process have been characterized, its structural basis, except for the well-known changes in the thalamocortical projection, remains obscure. To elucidate the relationship between synaptic remodeling and functional changes during this experience-dependent process, we used 2-photon microscopy to image synaptic structures of sparsely labeled layer 2/3 neurons in the binocular zone of mouse primary visual cortex. Anatomical changes at presynaptic and postsynaptic sites in mice undergoing monocular visual deprivation (MD) were compared to those in control mice with normal visual experience. We found that postsynaptic spines remodeled quickly in response to MD, with neurons more strongly dominated by the deprived eye losing more spines. These postsynaptic changes parallel changes in visual responses during MD and their recovery after restoration of binocular vision. In control animals with normal visual experience, the formation of presynaptic boutons increased during the critical period and then declined. MD affected bouton formation, but with a delay, blocking it after 3 days. These findings reveal intracortical anatomical changes in cellular layers of the cortex that can account for rapid activity-dependent plasticity.Significance statementThe operation of the cortex depends on the connections among its neurons. Taking advantage of molecular and genetic tools to label major proteins of the presynaptic and postsynaptic densities, we studied how connections of layer 2/3 excitatory neurons in mouse visual cortex were changed by monocular visual deprivation during the critical period, which causes amblyopia. The deprivation induced rapid remodeling of postsynaptic spines and impaired bouton formation. Structural measurement followed by calcium imaging demonstrated a strong correlation between changes in postsynaptic structures and functional responses in individual neurons after monocular deprivation. These findings suggest that anatomical changes at postsynaptic sites serve as a substrate for experience-dependent plasticity in the developing visual cortex.

scholarly journals Elastic Net Model of Ocular Dominance: Overall Stripe Pattern and Monocular Deprivation

1994 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 615-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey J. Goodhill ◽  
David J. Willshaw
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Primary Visual Cortex ◽  
Ocular Dominance ◽  
Monocular Deprivation ◽  
Elastic Net ◽  
Global Order ◽  
Stripe Pattern ◽  
Lateral Geniculate ◽  
Stripe Width

The elastic net (Durbin and Willshaw 1987) can account for the development of both topography and ocular dominance in the mapping from the lateral geniculate nucleus to primary visual cortex (Goodhill and Willshaw 1990). Here it is further shown for this model that (1) the overall pattern of stripes produced is strongly influenced by the shape of the cortex: in particular, stripes with a global order similar to that seen biologically can be produced under appropriate conditions, and (2) the observed changes in stripe width associated with monocular deprivation are reproduced in the model.

Critical period for monocular deprivation in the cat visual cortex

1992 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 197-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. W. Daw ◽  
K. Fox ◽  
H. Sato ◽  
D. Czepita
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Critical Period ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Ocular Dominance ◽  
Monocular Deprivation ◽  
Significant Shift ◽  
Cat Visual Cortex

1. Cats were monocularly deprived for 3 mo starting at 8-9 mo, 12 mo, 15 mo, and several years of age. Single cells were recorded in both visual cortexes of each cat, and the ocular dominance and layer determined for each cell. Ocular dominance histograms were then constructed for layers II/III, IV, and V/VI for each group of animals. 2. There was a statistically significant shift in the ocular dominance for cells in layers II/III and V/VI for the animals deprived between 8-9 and 11-12 mo of age. There was a small but not statistically significant shift for cells in layer IV from the animals deprived between 8-9 and 11-12 mo of age, and for cells in layers V/VI from the animals deprived between 15 and 18 mo of age. There was no noticeable shift in ocular dominance for any other layers in any other group of animals. 3. We conclude that the critical period for monocular deprivation is finally over at approximately 1 yr of age for extragranular layers (layers II, III, V, and VI) in visual cortex of the cat.

scholarly journals Critical periods in amblyopia

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
Author(s):  
TAKAO K. HENSCH ◽  
ELIZABETH M. QUINLAN
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Critical Period ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Ocular Dominance ◽  
Molecular Genetic ◽  
Monocular Deprivation ◽  
Critical Periods ◽  
Developmental Constraints ◽  
Early Postnatal Development ◽  
Visual Cortical

AbstractThe shift in ocular dominance (OD) of binocular neurons induced by monocular deprivation is the canonical model of synaptic plasticity confined to a postnatal critical period. Developmental constraints on this plasticity not only lend stability to the mature visual cortical circuitry but also impede the ability to recover from amblyopia beyond an early window. Advances with mouse models utilizing the power of molecular, genetic, and imaging tools are beginning to unravel the circuit, cellular, and molecular mechanisms controlling the onset and closure of the critical periods of plasticity in the primary visual cortex (V1). Emerging evidence suggests that mechanisms enabling plasticity in juveniles are not simply lost with age but rather that plasticity is actively constrained by the developmental up-regulation of molecular ‘brakes’. Lifting these brakes enhances plasticity in the adult visual cortex, and can be harnessed to promote recovery from amblyopia. The reactivation of plasticity by experimental manipulations has revised the idea that robust OD plasticity is limited to early postnatal development. Here, we discuss recent insights into the neurobiology of the initiation and termination of critical periods and how our increasingly mechanistic understanding of these processes can be leveraged toward improved clinical treatment of adult amblyopia.

Functional postnatal development of the rat primary visual cortex and the role of visual experience: Dark rearing and monocular deprivation

1994 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 709-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michela Fagiolini ◽  
Tommaso Pizzorusso ◽  
Nicoletta Berardi ◽  
Luciano Domenici ◽  
Lamberto Maffei
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Postnatal Development ◽  
Primary Visual Cortex ◽  
Visual Experience ◽  
Monocular Deprivation ◽  
Dark Rearing

Orientation Selectivity Is Reduced by Monocular Deprivation in Combination With PKA Inhibitors

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 1933-1940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris J. Beaver ◽  
Quentin S. Fischer ◽  
Qinghua Ji ◽  
Nigel W. Daw
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Critical Period ◽  
Ocular Dominance ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Orientation Selectivity ◽  
Monocular Deprivation ◽  
Ocular Dominance Plasticity ◽  
Kinase A

We have previously shown that the protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor, 8-chloroadenosine-3′,5′–monophosphorothioate (Rp-8-Cl-cAMPS), abolishes ocular dominance plasticity in the cat visual cortex. Here we investigate the effect of this inhibitor on orientation selectivity. The inhibitor reduces orientation selectivity in monocularly deprived animals but not in normal animals. In other words, PKA inhibitors by themselves do not affect orientation selectivity, nor does monocular deprivation by itself, but monocular deprivation in combination with a PKA inhibitor does affect orientation selectivity. This result is found for the receptive fields in both deprived and nondeprived eyes. Although there is a tendency for the orientation selectivity in the nondeprived eye to be higher than the orientation selectivity in the deprived eye, the orientation selectivity in both eyes is considerably less than normal. The result is striking in animals at 4 wk of age. The effect of the monocular deprivation on orientation selectivity is reduced at 6 wk of age and absent at 9 wk of age, while the effect on ocular dominance shifts is less changed in agreement with previous results showing that the critical period for orientation/direction selectivity ends earlier than the critical period for ocular dominance. We conclude that closure of one eye in combination with inhibition of PKA reduces orientation selectivity during the period that orientation selectivity is still mutable and that the reduction in orientation selectivity is transferred to the nondeprived eye.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document