scholarly journals Social cognition and social functioning in people with borderline personality disorder and their first-degree relatives

PeerJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e10212
Author(s):  
Esther Ortega-Díaz ◽  
Jonatan García-Campos ◽  
José María Rico-Gomis ◽  
Carlos Cuesta-Moreno ◽  
Antonio Palazón-Bru ◽  
...  

Background A few papers studying healthy, first-degree relatives of people with borderline personality disorder (BPD) have found that this group presents attention and memory problems. However, current research has not analyzed their social cognition. Materials and Methods We designed an age-, gender- and education-level matched case-control study involving 57 people with BPD, 32 of their first-degree relatives, and 57 healthy controls in Spain in 2018–2019. All were assessed for social cognition and functioning using the Movie for Assessment of Social Cognition and the Social Functioning Scale; other potential confounders were also collected (marital status, occupation and household variables). Results There were differences in the social cognition domain of overmentalizing errors, with the BPD group scoring significantly higher than controls; however, there was no significant difference with relatives; in the social functioning domain of family relationships, with the controls showing the highest scores. Social engagement/withdrawal, interpersonal behavior, independence-competence, prosocial activities, full scale and categorization domains showed the same pattern: the BPD group had lower scores than their relatives and the controls. Relatives were significantly different from BPD patients in family relationships, social engagement/withdrawal and interpersonal behavior, as well as on the full Social Functioning Scale (both as a linear and categorical variable). However, only controls showed differences with relatives in family relationships. Conclusions All in all, relatives show similar levels of social cognition and functioning compared with controls, and people with BPD show some alterations in different domains of both social cognition and functioning.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 458-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan Køster

Recently, mentalization theory has risen to fame as a theoretical framework emphasising social cognition as a key issue in its approach to psychopathology and psychotherapy. In this article, I review and criticise the social-ontological assumptions made by mentalization theory, arguing that, in spite of a strong interactive focus, it remains fundamentally rooted in a Cartesian ontology, overlooking embodied, expressive, enactive, and sociocultural dimensions of social cognition. Furthermore, since mentalization theory was originally developed as a framework for understanding Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD), I offer a reinterpretation of the issue of social cognition reported in BPD from a more embodied and interactional perspective. Contrary to the received view, I suggest that issues of social cognition in BPD should not necessarily be seen as a partial or total inability to mentalize, but rather as a hypersensitivity to expressivity resulting in what I suggest we understand as acts of disnarration.



2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (16) ◽  
pp. 2777-2786 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Schneider ◽  
U. Reininghaus ◽  
M. van Nierop ◽  
M. Janssens ◽  
I. Myin-Germeys ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe ecological validity of retrospective measures of social functioning is currently unknown in patients with schizophrenia. In the present study, patients with a diagnosis of non-affective psychosis were compared with controls on two measures of social functioning: the Social Functioning Scale (SFS) and daily-life measures collected with the Experience Sampling Methodology (ESM). The associations between both measures were examined in each group of participants to test for the ecological validity of the SFS.MethodsA total of 126 participants with a non-affective psychotic disorder and 109 controls completed the SFS and a 6-day momentary ESM protocol assessing various aspects of social functioning. Multiple linear and multilevel regression analyses were performed to test for group differences in social functioning level and examine associations between the two assessment techniques.ResultsLower social functioning was observed in patients compared with controls on retrospective and momentary measures. The SFS interpersonal domain (social engagement/withdrawal and interpersonal behaviour dimensions) was associated with the percentage of time spent alone and negative appraisal of social interactions. The SFS activity domain (pro-social and recreational activities dimensions) was negatively associated with time spent in leisure activities.ConclusionsThe SFS showed some degree of ecological validity at assessing broad aspects of social functioning. Low scores on the SFS social engagement/withdrawal and interpersonal behaviour dimensions captured social isolation and social avoidance in daily life, but not lack of interest in socializing. Ecological validity of the SFS activity domain was low. ESM offers a rich alternative to classical assessment techniques of social functioning.



2015 ◽  
Vol 229 (3) ◽  
pp. 872-879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Andreou ◽  
Lea Kelm ◽  
Julia Bierbrodt ◽  
Vivien Braun ◽  
Michael Lipp ◽  
...  


2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 578-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer J. Russell ◽  
D. S. Moskowitz ◽  
David C. Zuroff ◽  
Debbie Sookman ◽  
Joel Paris


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document