scholarly journals Efficient Market Hypothesis V/S Behavioural Finance

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 56-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ekanshi Gupta ◽  
◽  
Preetibedi Preetibedi ◽  
Poona mlakra

Financial markets are influenced by various factors but the most important factors is the reaction as well as perception of the people. Basically there are two discipline of financial market study i.e., Traditional finance and the new development called Behaviourial finance.Traditional finance foundation is truly based on efficient market concept&Behavioral finance argues that some financial phenomena can plausibly be understood using models in which some agents are not fully rational. The field has two building blocks: limits to arbitrage, which argues that it can be difficult for rational traders to undo the dislocations caused byless rational traders; and psychology, which catalogues the kinds of deviations from full rationality we might expect to see. We close by assessing progress in the field and speculating about its future course. In this paper an attempt has been made to highlight the shortcomings of the traditional finance theories as pointed out by behavioural finance supporters and also a discussion on the significance of behavioural finance. While conventional academic finance emphasizes theories such as modern portfolio theory and the efficient market hypothesis, the emerging field of behavioral finance investigates the psychological and sociological issues that impact the decision-making process of individuals, groups, and organizations. This paper will discuss some general principles of behavioral finance including the following: overconfidence, financial cognitive dissonance, the theory of regret, and prospect theory. In conclusion, the paper will provide strategies to assist individuals to resolve these “mental mistakes and errors” by recommending some important investment strategies for those who invest in stocks and mutual funds


2009 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-55
Author(s):  
Wiesław M. Grudzewski ◽  
Irena K. Hejduk ◽  
Dariusz Siudak

GIS Business ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-126
Author(s):  
Nitin Tanted ◽  
Prashant Mistry

One of the highly controversial issues in the area of finance is “Efficient Market Hypothesis”. Efficient Market Hypothesis states that, “In an efficient market, all available price information is reflected in the stock prices and it is not possible to generate abnormal returns compared to other investors.” A lot of studies conducted previouslyto test the Efficient Market Hypothesis, confirmed the theory until recent years, when some academicians found it to be non-applicable in financial markets. According to them, it is possible to forecast the stock price movements using Technical Analysis. The results of various studies have been inconclusive and indefinite about the issue. This study attempted to test the efficiency of FMCG Sector stocks in India in its weak form. For the study, closing prices of top 10 stocks from Nifty FMCG index has been taken for the 5-year period ranging from 1st October 2014 to 30th September 2019. Wald-Wolfowitz Run test has been used to test the haphazard movements in the stock price movements. The results indicated that FMCG sector stocks does support the Efficient Market Hypothesis and exhibit efficiency in its weak form. Hence, it is not possible to accurately predict the price movements of these stocks.


Author(s):  
Athina Bougioukou

The intention of this research is to investigate the aspect of non-linearity and chaotic behavior of the Cyprus stock market. For this purpose, we use non-linearity and chaos theory. We perform BDS, Hinich-Bispectral tests and compute Lyapunov exponent of the Cyprus General index. The results show that existence of non-linear dependence and chaotic features as the maximum Lyapunov exponent was found to be positive. This study is important because chaos and efficient market hypothesis are mutually exclusive aspects. The efficient market hypothesis which requires returns to be independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) cannot be accepted.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luboš Střelec ◽  
Theodore E. Simos ◽  
George Psihoyios ◽  
Ch. Tsitouras ◽  
Zacharias Anastassi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document