admissible representation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

11
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Petar Bakić ◽  
Marcela Hanzer

Abstract We describe explicitly the Howe correspondence for the symplectic-orthogonal and unitary dual pairs over a nonarchimedean local field of characteristic zero. More specifically, for every irreducible admissible representation of these groups, we find its first occurrence index in the theta correspondence and we describe, in terms of their Langlands parameters, the small theta lifts on all levels.


Author(s):  
Alexander Bertoloni Meli

Abstract We study the l-adic cohomology of unramified Rapoport–Zink spaces of EL-type. These spaces were used in Harris and Taylor's proof of the local Langlands correspondence for $\mathrm {GL_n}$ and to show local–global compatibilities of the Langlands correspondence. In this paper we consider certain morphisms $\mathrm {Mant}_{b, \mu }$ of Grothendieck groups of representations constructed from the cohomology of these spaces, as studied by Harris and Taylor, Mantovan, Fargues, Shin and others. Due to earlier work of Fargues and Shin we have a description of $\mathrm {Mant}_{b, \mu }(\rho )$ for $\rho $ a supercuspidal representation. In this paper, we give a conjectural formula for $\mathrm {Mant}_{b, \mu }(\rho )$ for $\rho $ an admissible representation and prove it when $\rho $ is essentially square-integrable. Our proof works for general $\rho $ conditionally on a conjecture appearing in Shin's work. We show that our description agrees with a conjecture of Harris in the case of parabolic inductions of supercuspidal representations of a Levi subgroup.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
KUMAR BALASUBRAMANIAN ◽  
EKTA TIWARI

Abstract Let F be a non-Archimedean local field of characteristic zero. Let G = GL(2, F) and $3\widetildeG = \widetilde{GL}(2,F)$ be the metaplectic group. Let τ be the standard involution on G. A well-known theorem of Gelfand and Kazhdan says that the standard involution takes any irreducible admissible representation of G to its contragredient. In such a case, we say that τ is a dualizing involution. In this paper, we make some modifications and adapt a topological argument of Tupan to the metaplectic group $\widetildeG$ and give an elementary proof that any lift of the standard involution to $\widetildeG$ ; is also a dualizing involution.


2017 ◽  
Vol 153 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raul Gomez ◽  
Dmitry Gourevitch ◽  
Siddhartha Sahi

We study generalized and degenerate Whittaker models for reductive groups over local fields of characteristic zero (archimedean or non-archimedean). Our main result is the construction of epimorphisms from the generalized Whittaker model corresponding to a nilpotent orbit to any degenerate Whittaker model corresponding to the same orbit, and to certain degenerate Whittaker models corresponding to bigger orbits. We also give choice-free definitions of generalized and degenerate Whittaker models. Finally, we explain how our methods imply analogous results for Whittaker–Fourier coefficients of automorphic representations. For $\text{GL}_{n}(\mathbb{F})$ this implies that a smooth admissible representation $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}$ has a generalized Whittaker model ${\mathcal{W}}_{{\mathcal{O}}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})$ corresponding to a nilpotent coadjoint orbit ${\mathcal{O}}$ if and only if ${\mathcal{O}}$ lies in the (closure of) the wave-front set $\operatorname{WF}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})$. Previously this was only known to hold for $\mathbb{F}$ non-archimedean and ${\mathcal{O}}$ maximal in $\operatorname{WF}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})$, see Moeglin and Waldspurger [Modeles de Whittaker degeneres pour des groupes p-adiques, Math. Z. 196 (1987), 427–452]. We also express ${\mathcal{W}}_{{\mathcal{O}}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})$ as an iteration of a version of the Bernstein–Zelevinsky derivatives [Bernstein and Zelevinsky, Induced representations of reductive p-adic groups. I., Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 10 (1977), 441–472; Aizenbud et al., Derivatives for representations of$\text{GL}(n,\mathbb{R})$and$\text{GL}(n,\mathbb{C})$, Israel J. Math. 206 (2015), 1–38]. This enables us to extend to $\text{GL}_{n}(\mathbb{R})$ and $\text{GL}_{n}(\mathbb{C})$ several further results by Moeglin and Waldspurger on the dimension of ${\mathcal{W}}_{{\mathcal{O}}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})$ and on the exactness of the generalized Whittaker functor.


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (04) ◽  
pp. 1043-1065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Johnson-Leung ◽  
Brooks Roberts

Let F be a non-Archimedean local field of characteristic zero, let (π, V) be an irreducible, admissible representation of GSp (4, F) with trivial central character, and let χ be a quadratic character of F× with conductor c(χ) > 1. We define a twisting operator Tχ from paramodular vectors for π of level n to paramodular vectors for χ ⊗ π of level max (n + 2c(χ), 4c(χ)), and prove that this operator has properties analogous to the well-known GL(2) twisting operator.


2010 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. 1180-1290 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-L. Waldspurger

AbstractLet V be a vector space over a p-adic field F, of finite dimension, let q be a non-degenerate quadratic form over V and let D be a non-isotropic line in V. Denote by W the hyperplane orthogonal to D, and by G and H the special orthogonal groups of V and W. Let π, respectively σ, be an irreducible admissible representation of G(F) , respectively H(F) . The representation σ appears as a quotient of the restriction of π to H(F) with a certain multiplicity m(π,σ) . We know that m(π,σ)≤1 . We assume that π is supercuspidal. Then we prove a formula that computes m(π,σ) as an integral of functions deduced from the characters of π and σ. Let Π, respectively Σ, be an L-packet of tempered irreducible representations of G(F) , respectively H(F) . Here we use the sophisticated notion of L-packet due to Vogan and we assume some usual conjectural properties of those packets. A weak form of the local Gross–Prasad conjecture says that there exists a unique pair (π,σ)∈Π×Σ such that m(π,σ)=1 . Assuming that the elements of Π are supercuspidal, we prove this assertion.


2008 ◽  
Vol 144 (6) ◽  
pp. 1504-1524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avraham Aizenbud ◽  
Dmitry Gourevitch ◽  
Eitan Sayag

AbstractLet F be an arbitrary local field. Consider the standard embedding $\mathrm {GL}_n(F) \hookrightarrow \mathrm {GL}_{n+1}(F)$ and the two-sided action of GLn(F)×GLn(F) on GLn+1(F). In this paper we show that any GLn(F)×GLn(F)-invariant distribution on GLn+1(F) is invariant with respect to transposition. We show that this implies that the pair (GLn+1(F), GLn(F)) is a Gelfand pair. Namely, for any irreducible admissible representation (π,E) of GLn+1(F), $\dim Hom_{\mathrm {GL}_n(F)}(E,\mathbb {C}) \leqslant 1$. For the proof in the archimedean case, we develop several tools to study invariant distributions on smooth manifolds.


1999 ◽  
Vol 1999 (508) ◽  
pp. 61-83
Author(s):  
J.-F Dat

Abstract Let G be a reductive p-adic group, we are interested in finitely generated projective smooth G-modules. Let P be such a module, consider it as a З-module, where З is the Bernstein center of the category of smooth G-modules. Then we can form P ⊗З.χℂ for every complex-valued character of З: it is a finite length smooth representation of G. We describe its image in the Grothendieck group of finite length smooth G-modules. To do this, we define under suitable assumptions a З-valued character on the З-admissible (but not admissible!) representation P. The case of indGK(1) where K is a special compact open subgroup of G is an interesting example. Some of his properties are discussed and extended to other representations of K using Bushnell and Kutzko's theory of types, when G = GL(n).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document