The reduced Dijkgraaf–Witten invariant of double twist knots in the Bloch group of 𝔽p

In 2004, Neumann showed that the complex hyperbolic volume of a hyperbolic 3-manifold [Formula: see text] can be obtained as the image of the Dijkgraaf–Witten invariant of [Formula: see text] by a certain 3-cocycle. After that, Zickert gave an analogue of Neumann’s work for free fields containing finite fields. The author formulated a geometric method to calculate a weaker version of Zickert’s analogue, called the reduced Dijkgraaf–Witten invariant, for finite fields and gave a formula for twist knot complements and [Formula: see text] in his previous work. In this paper, we show concretely how to calculate the reduced Dijkgraaf–Witten invariants of double twist knot complements and [Formula: see text], and give a formula of them for [Formula: see text].

The reduced Dijkgraaf–Witten invariant of twist knots in the Bloch group of a finite field

Let [Formula: see text] be a closed oriented 3-manifold and let [Formula: see text] be a discrete group. We consider a representation [Formula: see text]. For a 3-cocycle [Formula: see text], the Dijkgraaf–Witten invariant is given by [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the map induced by [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] denotes the fundamental class of [Formula: see text]. Note that [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the map induced by [Formula: see text], we consider an equivalent invariant [Formula: see text], and we also regard it as the Dijkgraaf–Witten invariant. In 2004, Neumann described the complex hyperbolic volume of [Formula: see text] in terms of the image of the Dijkgraaf–Witten invariant for [Formula: see text] by the Bloch–Wigner map from [Formula: see text] to the Bloch group of [Formula: see text]. In this paper, by replacing [Formula: see text] with a finite field [Formula: see text], we calculate the reduced Dijkgraaf–Witten invariants of the complements of twist knots, where the reduced Dijkgraaf–Witten invariant is the image of the Dijkgraaf–Witten invariant for SL[Formula: see text] by the Bloch–Wigner map from [Formula: see text] to the Bloch group of [Formula: see text].

Computing a categorical Gromov–Witten invariant

We compute the $g=1$, $n=1$ B-model Gromov–Witten invariant of an elliptic curve $E$ directly from the derived category $\mathsf{D}_{\mathsf{coh}}^{b}(E)$. More precisely, we carry out the computation of the categorical Gromov–Witten invariant defined by Costello using as target a cyclic $\mathscr{A}_{\infty }$ model of $\mathsf{D}_{\mathsf{coh}}^{b}(E)$ described by Polishchuk. This is the first non-trivial computation of a positive-genus categorical Gromov–Witten invariant, and the result agrees with the prediction of mirror symmetry: it matches the classical (non-categorical) Gromov–Witten invariants of a symplectic 2-torus computed by Dijkgraaf.

Chow rings of Mp̃0,2(N,d) and M¯0,2(ℙN−1,d) and Gromov–Witten invariants of projective hypersurfaces of degree 1 and 2

In this paper, we prove formulas that represent two-pointed Gromov–Witten invariant [Formula: see text] of projective hypersurfaces with [Formula: see text] in terms of Chow ring of [Formula: see text], the moduli spaces of stable maps from genus [Formula: see text] stable curves to projective space [Formula: see text]. Our formulas are based on representation of the intersection number [Formula: see text], which was introduced by Jinzenji, in terms of Chow ring of [Formula: see text], the moduli space of quasi maps from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] with two marked points. In order to prove our formulas, we use the results on Chow ring of [Formula: see text], that were derived by Mustaţǎ and Mustaţǎ. We also present explicit toric data of [Formula: see text] and prove relations of Chow ring of [Formula: see text].