raoul de cambrai
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

29
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Luke Sunderland

This chapter contends that vendettas in the Loheren cycle and Raoul de Cambrai work as alternative forms of justice and social order, and thus as a refusal of sovereignty. The barons reject royal justice and resist royal bans on feud, preferring to pursue their own grievances, via violence that preserves their position vis-à-vis the monarchy and the peasantry they exploit, just as it shapes competition with their own kind for resources both abstract and material (land, women, status, royal favour, honour). Networks of friendship, allegiance, and kinship are maintained for and by feuding. Feuding is thus more than war; indeed it includes in its dynamic periods of peace, and gives form and meaning to a world. The correct moral and social order is defended by feud. The feuding aristocracy thus usurps sovereignty by portraying itself as protector of the common good.


Neophilologus ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 371-385
Author(s):  
Katherine A. Brown
Keyword(s):  

2003 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. E. Sinclair
Keyword(s):  

Romania ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 118 (471) ◽  
pp. 315-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique Boutet
Keyword(s):  

2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-32
Author(s):  
Evelyne Oppermann
Keyword(s):  

1993 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 435-435
Author(s):  
W. G. V. EMDEN
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document