visual word processing
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

66
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

20
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-27
Author(s):  
Monireh Feizabadi ◽  
Andrea Albonico ◽  
Randi Starrfelt ◽  
Jason J. S. Barton

2018 ◽  
Vol 183 ◽  
pp. 54-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa M. Rundle ◽  
Donna Coch ◽  
Andrew C. Connolly ◽  
Richard H. Granger

2018 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bethany L. Sussman ◽  
Samir Reddigari ◽  
Sharlene D. Newman

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 517-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yufei Tan ◽  
Xiuhong Tong ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
Xuchu Weng ◽  
Sheng He ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-142
Author(s):  
Vanja Ković ◽  
Platon Sovilj † ◽  
Dejan Lalović

In search of the optimal method for assessing grammatical context effects on the visual word processing, we designed a study to demonstrate that in a simple task of reacting to “oddball“ word pairs, subjects read and linguistically processed both the function and the content word simultaneously presented in a given pair. Properties of the oddball ERP paradigm allowed for stipulation that word pairs would evoke P300 potentials, and that properties and differences between potentials evoked by grammatically congruent and grammatically neutral pairs would indicate a type of stimuli processing. To test such prediction, we paired a noun and a verb with a congruent preposition and a personal pronoun respectively, preceding them to create a grammatically constrained condition, or with the conjunction preceding both target words to create unconstrained condition. The stimuli were employed in the two-stimulus oddball paradigm. Main outcome of our experiment was that the stimuli chosen evoked clear P300 potential as deviants in three out of four situations. More interestingly, in each of the situations P300 peaked well after 400 ms, falling near the upper limit of P300 range as usually reported. Such P300 latencies marked semantic processing (Polich, 2007), and indicated subjects read and linguistically processed both words in pairs. Our results suggested that in order to study effects of the grammatical context on the visual word processing, the standard priming procedure in which primes temporally preceded targets might not be required, or that it could at least be complemented by methods involving simultaneous primes and target presentation less burdened by technical issues.


Author(s):  
Manuel Perea ◽  
Ana Marcet ◽  
Marta Vergara-Martínez

Abstract. Most words in books and digital media are written in lowercase. The primacy of this format has been brought out by different experiments showing that common words are identified faster in lowercase (e.g., molecule) than in uppercase (MOLECULE). However, there are common words that are usually written in uppercase (street signs, billboards; e.g., STOP, PHARMACY). We conducted a lexical decision experiment to examine whether the usual letter-case configuration (uppercase vs. lowercase) of common words modulates word identification times. To this aim, we selected 78 molecule-type words and 78 PHARMACY-type words that were presented in lowercase or uppercase. For molecule-type words, the lowercase format elicited faster responses than the uppercase format, whereas this effect was absent for PHARMACY-type words. This pattern of results suggests that the usual letter configuration of common words plays an important role during visual word processing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document