longitudinal instability
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

78
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 122707
Author(s):  
Soheil Khoshbinfar ◽  
Hanieh Esmaeilpour

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. e453
Author(s):  
Matthew Ricks ◽  
Adam Watts ◽  
Andrew Keightley

Author(s):  
Batbayar Khuyagbaatar ◽  
Sang-Jin Lee ◽  
Ulziikhutag Bayarjargal ◽  
Maro Cheon ◽  
Temuujin Batbayar ◽  
...  

Instability of the forearm is a complex problem that leads to pain and limited motions. Up to this time, no universal consensus has yet been reached as regards the optimal treatment for forearm instability. In some cases, conservative treatments are recommended for forearm instability injuries. However, quantitative studies on the conservative treatment of forearm instability are lacking. The present study developed a finite element model of the forearm to investigate the contribution of the distal radioulnar joint stabilizer on forearm stability. The stabilizer was designed to provide stability between the radius and ulna. The forearm model with and without the stabilizer was tested using the pure transverse separation and radial pull test for the different ligament sectioned models. The percentage contribution of the stabilizer and ligament structures resisting the load on the forearm was estimated. For the transverse stability of the forearm, the central band resisted approximately 50% of the total transverse load. In the longitudinal instability, the interosseous membrane resisted approximately 70% of the axial load. With the stabilizer, models showed that the stabilizer provided the transverse stability and resisted almost 1/4 of the total transverse load in the ligament sectioned models. The stabilizer provided transverse stability and reduced the loading on the ligaments. We suggested that a stabilizer can be applied in the conservative management of patients who do not have the gross longitudinal instability with the interosseous membrane and the triangular fibrocartilage complex disruption.


2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 81-88
Author(s):  
Todd A. Rubin ◽  
Matthew J. Gluck ◽  
Michael R. Hausman

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 861-869 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Phadnis ◽  
A. C. Watts

2016 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. 184-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randall Culp ◽  
A. Osterman ◽  
Julie Adams

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document