subordinate categorization
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Ryan Farrell ◽  
Om Oza ◽  
Ning Zhang ◽  
Vlad I. Morariu ◽  
Trevor Darrell ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 1054-1064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Céline R. Gillebert ◽  
Hans P. Op de Beeck ◽  
Sven Panis ◽  
Johan Wagemans

There is substantial evidence that object representations in adults are dynamically updated by learning. However, it is not clear to what extent these effects are induced by active processing of visual objects in a particular task context on top of the effects of mere exposure to the same objects. Here we show that the task does matter. We performed an event-related fMRI adaptation study in which we derived neural selectivity from a release of adaptation. We had two training conditions: “categorized objects” were categorized at a subordinate level based on fine shape differences (Which type of fish is this?), whereas “control objects” were seen equally often in a task context requiring no subordinate categorization (Is this a vase or not?). After training, the object-selective cortex was more selective for differences among categorized objects than for differences among control objects. This result indicates that the task context during training modulates the extent to which object selectivity is enhanced as a result of training.


2002 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Sigala ◽  
F. Gabbiani ◽  
N. K. Logothetis

We investigated the influence of a categorization task on the extraction and representation of perceptual features in humans and monkeys. The use of parameterized stimuli (schematic faces and fish) with fixed diagnostic features in combination with a similarity-rating task allowed us to demonstrate perceptual sensitization to the diagnostic dimensions of the categorization task for the monkeys. Moreover, our results reveal important similarities between human and monkey visual subordinate categorization strategies. Neither the humans nor the monkeys compared the new stimuli to class prototypes or based their decisions on conditional probabilities along stimulus dimensions. Instead, they classified each object according to its similarity to familiar members of the alternative categories, or with respect to its position to a linear boundary between the learned categories.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document