Microsurgical Scalp Reconstruction: An Overview of the Contemporary Approach

Background Microsurgical scalp reconstruction has evolved immensely in the last half-century. The core concepts of microsurgical scalp reconstruction have always been to transfer soft tissue of a sufficient quality to within the defect while minimizing donor site morbidity. Refinements in scalp reconstruction consist of both improvement in reducing donor site morbidity and enhancing recipient site contour and balance. Furthermore, technical advancements and the vast experience within our field have allowed for preoperative evaluation of recipient vessels that are more favorable in proximity to the scalp. Methods In this review, we aim to describe the contemporary approach to microsurgical scalp reconstruction. This is to include the indications of choosing free flaps as well as how to select the ideal flap based on patient-oriented factors. The need for cranioplasty, recipient vessel selection, operative technique, and reoperations is also reviewed. In addition, our considerations and the nuances within each category are also described. Summary Scalp reconstructions involve the fundamental tenants of plastic surgery and demand application of these principles to each case on an individual basis and a successful reconstruction must consider all aspects, with backup options at the ready. Two workhorse free flaps, the anterolateral thigh perforator and latissimus dorsi muscles flaps, serve a primary role in the contemporary approach to microsurgical scalp reconstruction. Conclusion We hope this review can lay the foundation for which future plastic surgeons may continue to build and advance the approach to complex microsurgical scalp reconstruction.

Microsurgical Reconstruction of Lower Limb Using Thoracodorsal Artery Perforator Chimeric Free Flap after Popliteal Artery Revascularization: A Case Report

Although traumatic popliteal artery injury is uncommon, it can significantly increase the risk of limb amputation because of the anatomical complexity and delayed diagnosis and treatment. Various tools are available for treatment. Recently, an endovascular approach has been attempted for such injuries; however, open surgical repair remains the standard treatment. An integrated and stepwise procedure involving multidisciplinary specialists, including emergency department personnel for initial evaluation, orthopedic surgeons for treating accompanying fractures or dislocations, vascular and plastic surgeons for vessel repair, and interventional radiologists for immediate diagnosis and implementation of the endovascular approach, is needed. Covering wound defects due to skin and soft tissue necrosis and irreversible ischemic damage remains difficult despite successfully revascularizing the injured vessels. Here, we describe a case of revascularization after popliteal artery injury along with successful reconstruction of a complex defect with a thoracodorsal artery perforator chimeric free flap when recipient vessel selection was limited.

Skin flaps

Flaps can reconstruct defects of the integument, resurface mucosal defects, as well as contribute to contour. They are used where grafting is not feasible because of the nature of the defect and/or where the aims of reconstruction would be better served by vascularized tissue with both cutaneous and subcutaneous components. A skin flap can also be combined with fascia, muscle, or bone to reconstruct a complex or composite defect, and to provide tissue to restore function. Flaps may be classified according to the origin of the flap: local skin flaps are raised from tissue adjacent to the defect (usually deriving their blood supply from the subcutaneous tissue and subdermal plexus), and distant flaps are raised on dedicated vascular pedicles from a non-contiguous region. A distant flap may be moved to the defect maintaining the continuity of the pedicle (a ‘regional’ or ‘pedicled’ flap) or as a free flap, where the flap is elevated from its remote donor site and the pedicle is divided to allow the flap to be transported ‘free’ to the defect and then the vascular continuity is re-established by anastomosis to a recipient vessel in the defect. This chapter focuses on local flaps.

Anatomic Considerations of Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery

Objective Though microvascular free tissue transfer is well established for open skull base reconstruction, normative data regarding flap design and inset after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (ESBS) is lacking. We aim to describe anatomical considerations of endoscopic endonasal inset of free tissue transfer of transclival (TC) and anterior cranial base resection (ACBR) defects. Design and Setting Radial forearm free tissue transfer (RFFTT) model. Participants Six cadaveric specimens. Main Outcome Measures Pedicle orientation, pedicle length, and recipient vessel intraluminal diameter. Results TC and ACBR defects averaged 17.2 and 11.7 cm2, respectively. Anterior and lateral maxillotomies and endoscopic medial maxillectomies were prepared as corridors for flap and pedicle passage. Premasseteric space tunnels were created for pedicle tunneling to recipient facial vessels. For TC defects, the RFFTT pedicle was oriented cranially with the flap placed against the clival defect (mean pedicle length 13.1 ± 0.6 cm). For ACBR defects, the RFFTT pedicle was examined in three orientations with respect to anterior–posterior axis of the RFFTT: anteriorly, posteriorly, and laterally. Lateral orientation offered the shortest average pedicle length required for anastomosis in the neck (11.6 ± 1.29 cm), followed by posterior (13.4 ± 0.7cm) and anterior orientations (14.4 ± 1.1cm) (p < 0.00001, analysis of variance). Conclusions In ACBR reconstruction using RFFTT, our data suggests lateral pedicle orientation shortens the length required to safely anastomose facial vessels and protects the frontal sinus outflow anteriorly while limiting pedicle exposure through a maxillary corridor within the nasal cavity. With greater understanding of anatomical factors related to successful preoperative flap planning, free tissue transfer may be added to the ESBS reconstruction ladder. Level of Evidence NA

A case report of a reverse sural flap for posterior ankle soft-tissue defect following an injury in a patient from Tanzania

In the treatment and management of severe wounds, microsurgical repair remains the gold standard. However, it is difficult to transfer free tissue from a Tanzanian perspective due to donor site morbidity, longer operational times, bulky forms, recipient vessel stress, sophisticated surgical expertise, and high costs of the equipment. Meanwhile, the reverse sural flap has been considered as the ultimate tissue restoration technique. This study reviews a case of a 35-year-old man who was admitted at Mbeya Zonal Referral Hospital in the Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma, and Neurosurgery in Mbeya, Tanzania. The patient had a 9-day injury to the rear of his right ankle due to a cut he suffered after tripping over a toilet seat in the washroom. After the diagnosis, the plan involved surgical debridement, tendon repair, and reverse sural flap rotation. Despite the difficult working environment requiring advanced learning experience, our patient fully recovered after 3 weeks. Proving that reverse sural flap is one of the few available possibilities in the protection of vital structures such as bone or tendons, in the distal areas of the leg, ankle, and foot especially when the medical treatment facility lacks a strong microsurgery team and equipment.