Efficacy of Carragelose® Nasal Spray Impregnated Versus Mupirocin Ointment Impregnated Nasal Packs on Mucosal Healing after Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Double-Blind, Non-Randomized, Right-Left Side Comparison

ABSTRACTObjective: To determine the efficacy of carragelose® nasal spray versus mupirocin ointment impregnated nasal packs on postoperative mucosal healing among chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) patients after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Methods:Design: Double-Blind, Non-Randomized, Right-Left Side ComparisonSetting: Tertiary Government Training HospitalParticipants: Fifteen (15) patients diagnosed with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) who had ESS were included in the study. Nasal packs (Netcell®) impregnated with carragelose® nasal spray or mupirocin ointment were respectively applied in right and left nostrils. Postoperative mucosal healing was graded by a blinded consultant using the Lund-Kennedy Endoscopic Scoring System and Perioperative Sinus Endoscopy (POSE) scoring system. Results: Six patients (12 nasal sides) completed the study. Comparing nasal packs impregnated with carragelose® nasal spray mupirocin ointment, the carragelose® group had lower Lund- Kennedy median scores than the mupirocin group on the 7th post-operative day; and this was statistically significant (p = .027). There were no significant differences in Lund-Kennedy postoperative scores on days 4 (p = .217), 14 (p = .171) and 28 (p = .151). Conclusion: Carragelose® nasal spray impregnated nasal packs may be comparable with, and may be an alternative to mupirocin ointment impregnated nasal packs in terms of postoperative mucosal healing among ESS patients with CRSwNP.

Bacterial Flora in Normal Adult Maxillary Sinuses

Background Conflicting data exist about the presence of bacteria in healthy maxillary sinus cavities. This study was designed to determine the bacterial flora and to quantify the level of bacterial presence in healthy maxillary sinus cavities. Method Subjects included 34 patients undergoing Lefort I osteotomy for orthognathic surgery. All patients were preoperatively evaluated by a questionnaire and a complete physical examination including sinus endoscopy. Our exclusion criteria were presence of sinonasal symptoms, asthma, antibiotic treatment in the past 3 months, treatment with local steroids, previous sinonasal surgery, traumatic surgery, and an abnormal CT scan or sinus endoscopy. Washes were obtained from maxillary sinuses before surgery through an antral puncture. The sinus was irrigated with sterile saline followed by aspiration with a syringe attached to the trocar. Basic sterility rules were rigorously applied. Specimens were transported to the laboratory in an air-free syringe. Time between collection of materials and inoculation of the specimen did not exceed 15 minutes. Specimens were inoculated for aerobic and anaerobic organisms. Results After applying the selection criteria, 14 patients (28 sinuses) remained. Eight (57.1%) were men with a mean age of 22.7 years; 82.14% of the specimens were sterile. Bacterial organisms were recovered in only four patients with two different coagulase-negative staphylococci in the same patient: one in each sinus with 200 UFC/mL in the left sinus and 10 UFC/mL in the right sinus, one Citrobacter fundii (70 UFC/mL) and two polymorphic floras. Conclusion This descriptive study shows the large predominance of sterile maxillary sinus cavities in asymptomatic adults with endoscopically normal mucosa.