stability spectrum
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

9
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2017 ◽  
Vol 360 ◽  
pp. 17-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard Deconinck ◽  
Peter McGill ◽  
Benjamin L. Segal

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 1250001 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOHN T. BALDWIN ◽  
SAHARON SHELAH

We prove two results on the stability spectrum for Lω1,ω. Here [Formula: see text] denotes an appropriate notion (at or mod) of Stone space of m-types over M. (1) Theorem for unstable case: Suppose that for some positive integer m and for every α < δ(T), there is an M ∈ K with [Formula: see text]. Then for every λ ≥ |T|, there is an M with [Formula: see text]. (2) Theorem for strictly stable case: Suppose that for every α < δ (T), there is Mα ∈ K such that λα = |Mα| ≥ ℶα and [Formula: see text]. Then for any μ with μℵ0 > μ, K is not i-stable in μ. These results provide a new kind of sufficient condition for the unstable case and shed some light on the spectrum of strictly stable theories in this context. The methods avoid the use of compactness in the theory under study. In this paper, we expound the construction of tree indiscernibles for sentences of Lω1,ω. Further we provide some context for a number of variants on the Ehrenfeucht–Mostowski construction.


2010 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Anbo ◽  
Koichiro Ikeda

2002 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rami Grossberg ◽  
Olivier Lessmann
Keyword(s):  

1992 ◽  
Vol 46 (24) ◽  
pp. 16045-16057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raz Kupferman ◽  
Ofer Shochet ◽  
Eshel Ben-Jacob ◽  
Zeev Schuss

1985 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 809-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akito Tsuboi

In [3], Shelah defined the cardinals κn(T) and , for each theory T and n < ω. κn(T) is the least cardinal κ without a sequence (pi)i<κ of complete n-types such that pi is a forking extension of pj for all i < j < κ. It is essential in computing the stability spectrum of a stable theory. On the other hand is called the number of independent partitions of T. (See Definition 1.2 below.) Unfortunately this invariant has not been investigated deeply. In the author's opinion, this unfortunate situation of is partially due to the fact that its definition is complicated in expression. In this paper, we shall give equivalents of which can be easily handled.In §1 we shall state the definitions of κn(T) and . Some basic properties of forking will be stated in this section. We shall also show that if = ∞ then T has the independence property.In §2 we shall give some conditions on κ, n, and T which are equivalent to the statement . (See Theorem 2.1 below.) We shall show that does not depend on n. We introduce the cardinal ı(T), which is essential in computing the number of types over a set which is independent over some set, and show that ı(T) is closely related to . (See Theorems 2.5 and 2.6 below.) The author expects the reader will discover the importance of via these theorems.Some of our results are motivated by exercises and questions in [3, Chapter III, §7]. The author wishes to express his heartfelt thanks to the referee for a number of helpful suggestions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document