Correction: Substituents drive ligand rearrangements, giving dinuclear rather than mononuclear complexes, and tune CoII/III redox potential

Correction for ‘Substituents drive ligand rearrangements, giving dinuclear rather than mononuclear complexes, and tune CoII/III redox potential’ by Fabrice N. H. Karabulut et al., Dalton Trans., 2018, 47, 11749–11759, DOI: 10.1039/c8dt01502c.

Substituents drive ligand rearrangements, giving dinuclear rather than mononuclear complexes, and tune CoII/III redox potential

Sterically encumbered 6-halo-substituents lead to BF4/MeOH/ligand rearrangement, forming doubly bridged {Co1–[O(Me)–B(F2)–O(R)]2–Co1A} dinuclear complexes (6-Cl, 6-Br) of the modified ligands.

First homoleptic MIC and heteroleptic NHC–MIC coordination cages from 1,3,5-triphenylbenzene-bridged tris-MIC and tris-NHC ligands

Homoleptic tris-MIC cylinder-like (Ag, Au) and heteroleptic tris-NHC/tris-MIC (Ag) cages are reported. The heteroleptic cage is obtained by unusual ligand rearrangements.

Mixed anhydride complexes of rhodium(i) and ruthenium(ii) – their synthesis and ligand rearrangements

The coordination chemistry and solution behaviour of Rh(i) and Ru(ii) complexes derived from mixed anhydride ligands were explored. Mixed anhydride complexes rearrange in solution via a number of pathways and plausible mechanisms for some of the rearrangements are proposed.