Control of resting ventilation rate in grasshoppers

We examined the effect of extracellular acid-base status and tracheal gas levels on the ventilation rate of resting Romalea guttata and Schistocerca americana grasshoppers. We manipulated haemolymph pH and [HCO3-] within normal physiological ranges using injections of HCl, NaOH, NaHCO3 and NaCl into the haemocoel. In contrast to terrestrial vertebrates, there was no evidence that extracellular acidification increases ventilation rate in grasshoppers. Elevation of haemolymph bicarbonate levels (by NaHCO3 injection) increased ventilation rate, while depression of haemolymph bicarbonate levels (HCl injection) had no effect. Injection of NaHCO3 also increased tracheal PCO2, suggesting that the effect of the NaHCO3 injection might be mediated by a sensitivity of the ventilatory system to tracheal gases. We tested for effects of tracheal gases on ventilation rate by independently manipulating tracheal PCO2 and PO2 using tracheal perfusions. Ventilation rate was positively correlated with tracheal PCO2 and negatively correlated with tracheal PO2. Increasing tracheal PO2 above normal resting levels or decreasing tracheal PCO2 below normal levels decreased ventilation rate. We conclude that quiescent grasshoppers regulate tracheal PCO2 and PO2 by varying ventilation rate and that both PCO2 and PO2 in the trachea stimulate ventilation in normal, resting grasshoppers.

DISCONTINUOUS CARBON DIOXIDE RELEASE IN THE EASTERN LUBBER GRASSHOPPER ROMALEA GUTTATA AND ITS EFFECT ON RESPIRATORY TRANSPIRATION

Ventilatory patterns were examined in the Eastern lubber grasshopper Romalea guttata and correlated with respiratory transpiration. Discontinuous release of CO2 was only observed in quiescent individuals during their scotophase. Interburst periods (spiracles closed) alternated with bouts of CO2 emission and O2 consumption (burst phase); no true ‘flutter’ phase was observed. Cycle duration decreased with increasing temperature in both hydrated and dehydrated individuals. Metabolic rates for this large, sluggish species are lower than those reported for smaller and/or more active grasshoppers. Water loss rates fell within an expected range of values for arthropods from mesic environments. Respiratory transpiration accounted for only 1.9-3.9 % of the total water loss between 15 and 30 sC and for only 7 % of the water loss during the burst phase of the cycle. These data indicate that the cyclic release of CO2 in this adult insect does not result in substantial savings of water.

Anatomy, ultrastructure, and functional morphology of the metathoracic tracheal defensive glands of the grasshopper Romalea guttata

In the lubber grasshopper Romalea guttata, the respiratory system produces, stores, and delivers a phenolic defensive secretion. The exudate is secreted by a glandular epithelium surrounding the metathoracic spiracular tracheal trunks. Embedded in the glandular tissue are multiple secretory units, each comprised of a basal secretory cell and an apical duct cell. Secretory cells have numerous mitochondria, a tubular, smooth endoplasmic reticulum, well-developed Golgi bodies, and a microvillilined vesicle thought to transfer secretion to the intracellular cuticular duct of a duct cell. Ducts empty into the metathoracic tracheal lumina where the exudate is stored behind the closed metathoracic spiracle. Tactile stimulation elicits secretion discharge, which begins when all spiracles except the metathoracic pair are closed and the abdomen is compressed. Increased hemostatic and pneumatic pressures drive air and secretion out of the spiracle with an audible hiss. Both metathoracic spiracles discharge simultaneously. The secretion erupts first as a dispersant spray, then as an adherent froth, and finally assumes the form of a slowly evaporating repellent droplet. Discharge force and number vary with eliciting stimuli, volume of stored secretion, and age, disturbance state, and temperature of the insect. Molting grasshoppers are unable to discharge because the stored exudate is lost with the shed cuticle. The advantages and limitations of a tracheal defensive system are discussed.