iterative ct reconstruction
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

59
(FIVE YEARS 9)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Viktor Haase ◽  
Karl Stierstorfer ◽  
Katharina Hahn ◽  
Harald Schöndube ◽  
Andreas Maier ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 534-537
Author(s):  
Britta König ◽  
Nika Guberina ◽  
Hilmar Kühl ◽  
Waldemar Zylka

AbstractWe investigate the suitability of statistical and model-based iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm strengths and their influence on image quality and diagnostic performance in low-dose computer tomography (CT) protocols for lung-cancer screening procedures. We evaluate the inter- and intra-observer performance for the assessment of iterative CT reconstruction. Artificial lung foci shaped as spheres and spicules made from material with calibrated Hounsfield units were pressed within layered granules in lung lobes of an anthropomorphic phantom. Adaptively, a soft-tissue- and fat- extension ring were attached. The phantom with foci was scanned using standard high contrast, low-dose and ultra lowdose protocols. For reconstruction the IR algorithm ADMIRE at four different strength levels were used. Two ranking tests and Friedman statistics were performed. Fleiss k and modified Cohen’s kneywere used to quantify inter- and intra-observer performance. In conjunction with the standard lung kernel BL75 radiologists evaluated medium to high IR strength, with preference to S4, as suitable for lung foci detection. When varying reconstruction kernels the ranking became more random than with varying phantom diameter. The inter-observer reliability shows poor to slight agreement expressed by k<0 and k=0-0.20 . For the intra-observer reliability non- agreement with kney=0-0.20and moderate agreement with kney=0.60-0.79 for the first ranking test, and almost perfect agreement with kney>0.90 for the second ranking test was observed. In conclusion, our validation suggests radiological preference of medium to high iteration strengths, especially S4, for lung foci detection. An investigation of the correlation between diagnostic experience and the subjective perception of IR reconstructed CT images still needs to be investigated.


Author(s):  
Viktor Haase ◽  
Karl Stierstorfer ◽  
Katharina Hahn ◽  
Harald Schöndube ◽  
Andreas Maier ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 205846011985626
Author(s):  
Oliver S Grosser ◽  
Juri Ruf ◽  
Dennis Kupitz ◽  
Damian Czuczwara ◽  
David Loewenthal ◽  
...  

Background Iterative computed tomography (CT) image reconstruction shows high potential for the preservation of image quality in diagnostic CT while reducing patients’ exposure; it has become available for low-dose CT (LD-CT) in high-end hybrid imaging systems (e.g. single-photon emission computed tomography [SPECT]-CT). Purpose To examine the effect of an iterative CT reconstruction algorithm on image quality, image noise, detectability, and the reader’s confidence for LD-CT data by a subjective assessment. Material and Methods The LD-CT data were validated for 40 patients examined by an abdominal hybrid SPECT-CT (U = 120 kV, I = 40 mA, pitch = 1.375). LD-CT was reconstructed using either filtered back projection (FBP) or an iterative image reconstruction algorithm (Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction [ASIR]®) with different parameters (ASIR levels 50% and 100%). The data were validated by two independent blinded readers using a scoring system for image quality, image noise, detectability, and reader confidence, for a predefined set of 16 anatomic substructures. Results The image quality was significantly improved by iterative reconstruction of the LD-CT data compared with FBP ( P ≤ 0.0001). While detectability increased in only 2/16 structures ( P ≤ 0.03), the reader’s confidence increased significantly due to iterative reconstruction ( P ≤ 0.002). Meanwhile, at the ASIR level of 100%, the detectability in bone structure was highly reduced ( P = 0.003). Conclusion An ASIR level of 50% represents a good compromise in abdominal LD-CT image reconstruction. The specific ASIR level improved image quality (reduced image noise) and reader confidence, while preserving detectability of bone structure.


Author(s):  
Viktor Haase ◽  
Karl Stierstorfer ◽  
Katharina Hahn ◽  
Harald Schöndube ◽  
Andreas Maier ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document