cochlear nonlinearity
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

32
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Abdala ◽  
Amanda J. Ortmann ◽  
Yeini C. Guardia


Author(s):  
Abishek Umashankar ◽  
Lakshmanabharathi R ◽  
C Pachaiappan ◽  
Prashanth Prabhu

Background and Aim: The threshold of octave masking test has been used to assess the growth rate of aural harmonics, the intercept point helped differentiate between normal-hearing individuals and sensorineural hearing loss due to noise exposure. With fewer literatures that have been documented, there is a need to explore this test procedure, and hence the purpose of this research is to evaluate the utility of the threshold of octave masking (TOM) procedure in understanding the frequency selectivity and non-linear function of cochlea. Methods: A total of 10 adults (20 ears) were considered for the test. The TOM test procedure was performed on the subjects where the subjects had to identify the presence of a maskee tone (1 kHz) in the presence of a masker tone (500 Hz) across 5 dB increment of masker tone until the subjects uncomfortable level. A line graph was drawn, extrapolated to identify the point of intercept, which is the threshold of octave masking. Results: Results reveal that 17 ears did not have a linear growth but had a 10 to 20 dB gap after a particular maskee level. The intercept point of the initial two extreme points was relatively more than the intercept point of the extreme points at higher intensities. Conclusion: Results from the present study have thrown light on the fact that TOM can be used as a test to measure the frequency selectivity along with the tests of psychophysical tuning curves, notched noise method, non-simultaneous masking, and other non-peripheral masking phenomena. Keywords: Threshold of octave masking; active mechanism; passive mechanism; nonlinearity;frequency selectivity; psychophysical tuning curves  



2021 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 233121652110161
Author(s):  
Michal Fereczkowski ◽  
Torsten Dau ◽  
Ewen N. MacDonald

While an audiogram is a useful method of characterizing hearing loss, it has been suggested that including a complementary, suprathreshold measure, for example, a measure of the status of the cochlear active mechanism, could lead to improved diagnostics and improved hearing-aid fitting in individual listeners. While several behavioral and physiological methods have been proposed to measure the cochlear-nonlinearity characteristics, evidence of a good correspondence between them is lacking, at least in the case of hearing-impaired listeners. If this lack of correspondence is due to, for example, limited reliability of one of such measures, it might be a reason for limited evidence of the benefit of measuring peripheral compression. The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between measures of the peripheral-nonlinearity status estimated using two psychoacoustical methods (based on the notched-noise and temporal-masking curve methods) and otoacoustic emissions, on a large sample of hearing-impaired listeners. While the relation between the estimates from the notched-noise and the otoacoustic emissions experiments was found to be stronger than predicted by the audiogram alone, the relations between the two measures and the temporal-masking based measure did not show the same pattern, that is, the variance shared by any of the two measures with the temporal-masking curve-based measure was also shared with the audiogram.



2020 ◽  
Vol 119 (10) ◽  
pp. 2087-2101
Author(s):  
C. Elliott Strimbu ◽  
Yi Wang ◽  
Elizabeth S. Olson




2017 ◽  
Vol 142 (6) ◽  
pp. 3510-3519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Altoè ◽  
Karolina K. Charaziak ◽  
Christopher A. Shera


2016 ◽  
Vol 140 (4) ◽  
pp. 3154-3154
Author(s):  
Amir Nankali ◽  
Aritra Sasmal ◽  
Karl Grosh




2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Stoelinga ◽  
Inseok Heo ◽  
Glenis Long ◽  
Jungmee Lee ◽  
Robert Lutfi ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document