meaning postulates
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

22
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Philosophy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holger Andreas

What is a theoretical term? This question can be answered in at least two different ways. First, a theoretical term is simply a non-observational term. Second, a theoretical term is one whose meaning depends on the axioms of a scientific theory. According to the first explanation, a theoretical term cannot be applied using just unaided perception, without drawing inferences. This explanation defines the notion of theoreticity merely as the absence of observability. The second explanation, by contrast, has the virtue of giving a positive characterization of the notion of theoreticity. Both explanations stand in the need of further elaboration. If we characterize theoretical terms by non-observability, we need to explain what an observational term is. There is no consensus in the literature as to whether and, if so, to what extent it is feasible to draw the theory-observation distinction. On the one hand, critics of the theory-observation distinction have often attacked only weak proposals of how to draw the distinction in question. On the other hand, the extreme skepticism by Thomas S. Kuhn, Paul K. Feyerabend, and Norwood R. Hanson concerning the distinction is increasingly losing consensus among contemporary philosophers of science. This is evidenced, for example, by attempts at exploiting the formal semantics of theoretical terms in one version of structural realism. If we explain the notion of a theoretical term by way of semantic dependency upon a scientific theory, we need to give an account of this semantic relation. How does a theory determine the meaning of a theoretical term? What, if any, are the differences between theoretical terms and defined terms? How can we distinguish, in a sensible way, between the synthetic assertions of a scientific theory about the world and meaning postulates determining the meaning of theoretical terms? Various formal semantics of theoretical terms have been devised in order to answer these questions. Notably, the idea that the meaning of a theoretical term is determined by a scientific theory, or a set of such theories, has already been expressed by Pierre Duhem and Henrie Poincaré. The theory-observation distinction can be applied to syntactic and semantic entities. Thus, we can speak of theoretical terms and theoretical concepts. Moreover, we can speak of theoretical entities, in the sense of specific objects that are the referents of theoretical concepts. Philosophical research on theoreticity concerns syntactic aspects inasmuch as semantic aspects of theoreticity.



Author(s):  
Lucas Champollion

This chapter presents stratified reference as an answer to the question how to capture the difference between boundedness and unboundedness. The parallelism between the telic/atelic, collective/distributive, singular/plural, and count/mass oppositions is captured in a unified framework. After a brief overview over the empirical phenomena that have been discussed under the rubric of distributivity, the notion of stratified reference is gradually developed as a generalized notion of distributivity. It is then used to formulate a single constraint that explains the behavior of the three constructions (for-adverbials, pseudopartitives, and adverbial each) discussed in the book, and to predict distributive entailments of lexical predicates via meaning postulates.



Author(s):  
Lucas Champollion

This chapter accounts for differences within the class of collective predicates, as exemplified by the contrast between all the students gathered and *all the students were numerous (Dowty 1987, Winter 2001), for the limited ability of all to take part in cumulative readings, and for its ability to license dependent plurals (Zweig 2009). Stratified reference is used to formulate meaning postulates that capture the fact that predicates like gather that give rise to distributive inferences to subgroups, and to formulate the semantics of all in terms of a subgroup distributivity requirement.



Semantics ◽  
2012 ◽  
pp. 205-217
Author(s):  
James R. Hurford ◽  
Brendan Heasley ◽  
Michael B. Smith
Keyword(s):  




Author(s):  
K. Allan
Keyword(s):  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document