optimal pebbling
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

16
(FIVE YEARS 8)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2020 ◽  
Vol 279 ◽  
pp. 125-133
Author(s):  
Chin-Lin Shiue
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 803-829
Author(s):  
Ervin Győri ◽  
Gyula Y. Katona ◽  
László F. Papp

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 582-587
Author(s):  
Ze-Tu Gao ◽  
Jian-Hua Yin

Abstract Given a distribution of pebbles on the vertices of a connected graph G, a pebbling move on G consists of taking two pebbles off one vertex and placing one on an adjacent vertex. The optimal pebbling number of G, denoted by πopt(G), is the smallest number m such that for some distribution of m pebbles on G, one pebble can be moved to any vertex of G by a sequence of pebbling moves. Let Pk be the path on k vertices. Snevily defined the n–k spindle graph as follows: take n copies of Pk and two extra vertices x and y, and then join the left endpoint (respectively, the right endpoint) of each Pk to x (respectively, y), the resulting graph is denoted by S(n, k), and called the n–k spindle graph. In this paper, we determine the optimal pebbling number for spindle graphs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 266 ◽  
pp. 340-345
Author(s):  
Ervin Győri ◽  
Gyula Y. Katona ◽  
László F. Papp
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 342 (7) ◽  
pp. 2148-2157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ervin Győri ◽  
Gyula Y. Katona ◽  
László F. Papp ◽  
Casey Tompkins

2019 ◽  
Vol 260 ◽  
pp. 117-130
Author(s):  
A. Czygrinow ◽  
G. Hurlbert ◽  
G.Y. Katona ◽  
L.F. Papp

2019 ◽  
Vol 260 ◽  
pp. 284-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chin-Lin Shiue
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Ervin Győri ◽  
Gyula Y. Katona ◽  
László F. Papp
Keyword(s):  

In [6] the authors conjecture that if every vertex of an infinite square grid is reachable from a pebble distribution, then the covering ratio of this distribution is at most 3.25. First we present such a distribution with covering ratio 3.5, disproving the conjecture. The authors in the above paper also claim to prove that the covering ratio of any pebble distribution is at most 6.75. The proof contains some errors. We present a few interesting pebble distributions that this proof does not seem to cover and highlight some other difficulties of this topic.


2017 ◽  
Vol 221 ◽  
pp. 46-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustapha Chellali ◽  
Teresa W. Haynes ◽  
Stephen T. Hedetniemi ◽  
Thomas M. Lewis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document