Role of dynamic ultrasound in assessment of the snapping elbow and distal biceps tendon injury

Introduction Ultrasound is useful in assessing patients with snapping syndromes around the elbow joint. The dynamic nature of the examination allows for direct visualisation of the underlying causative factor. Topic description: We discuss the role of dynamic ultrasound in assessing various snapping syndromes around the elbow, such as ulnar nerve instability, snapping triceps and less commonly, snapping brachialis. Ultrasound is also useful in evaluating the distal biceps tendon, particularly in differentiating partial from complete tendon injury. Discussion Ulnar nerve instability and snapping triceps can be assessed via a medial approach with the transducer placed transversely between the medial epicondyle and the olecranon. In ulnar nerve instability, the nerve can be seen crossing over the medial epicondyle on elbow flexion. In snapping triceps syndrome, both the ulnar nerve and the distal triceps can be seen dislocating over the medial epicondyle. Dynamic assessment of the distal biceps tendon using a lateral approach minimises anisotropy artefact often seen on the anterior approach. Passive pronation and supination of the forearm will reveal little or no movement in a completely torn tendon whereas moving tendon fibres will be appreciated in partial tears. In a snapping brachialis, the medial portion of brachialis will be seen abnormally translocating anterolateral to the medial border of the trochlea during elbow flexion and snapping back into its normal position on elbow extension. Conclusion Dynamic ultrasound of the elbow is valuable in diagnosing patients with snapping sensations around the joint and in evaluating the integrity of the distal biceps tendon.

In idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome, ulnar nerve excursion and instability can be reduced by repairing Osborne’s ligament after simple decompression

Osborne’s modified decompression involves repairing Osborne’s ligament beneath the ulnar nerve after simple decompression for idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome. In this retrospective interrupted time series, 31 patients underwent modified simple decompression and 20 patients underwent conventional simple decompression. In the modified simple decompression group, the ulnar nerve length was measured at operation in full elbow flexion and extension before and after repair of Osborne’s ligament. Ulnar nerve instability during elbow motion was measured using ultrasonography before operation and at 12 months after operation. In patients treated by modified simple decompression, the ulnar nerve length in full elbow flexion reduced significantly after repair of Osborne’s ligament. At 12 months after surgery, the grade of ulnar nerve instability was lower in the modified simple decompression group than in the conventional simple decompression group. The clinical outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups at 24 months after operation. Level of evidence: III

Decision-Making Factors for Ulnar Nerve Transposition in Cubital Tunnel Surgery

Background We designed a survey to ascertain the current perspectives of hand surgeons on the evaluation and management of ulnar nerve instability at the elbow. The secondary aim was to assess the concordance of hand surgeons on definitions of the terms “subluxated” and “dislocated” for classification of ulnar nerve instability. Methods A questionnaire, including demographic practice variables, cubital tunnel practice patterns, preoperative imaging and electrodiagnostic evaluation, and a series of standardized intraoperative photographs of ulnar nerve instability at the elbow were developed and distributed to the current American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) membership. Results A total of 690 (26.8%) members completed the survey; 84.2% of respondents indicated that they evaluate for ulnar nerve instability preoperatively with clinical examination, whereas only 6.1% indicated they routinely obtained dynamic ultrasound. Respondents indicated that the factors most strongly influencing their decision to proceed with anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve were subluxation on physical examination (89.6%), history consistent with ulnar nerve subluxation (85.8%), and muscle atrophy (43.2%). On review of clinical photographs, respondents demonstrated varying degrees of agreement on the terms “subluxated” or “dislocated” and recommendations for ulnar nerve transposition at intermediate degrees of ulnar nerve instability. Conclusion ASSH members routinely evaluate for ulnar nerve instability with history and clinical examination without uniform use of preoperative ultrasound, and nearly half of the time the decision to transpose the ulnar nerve is made intraoperatively. Definitions for the degree of ulnar nerve instability at the elbow are not uniformly agreed upon, and further development of a classification system may be warranted to standardize treatment.