ideomotor compatibility
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

10
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 742-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Maquestiaux ◽  
Morgan Lyphout-Spitz ◽  
Eric Ruthruff ◽  
Mahé Arexis

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 1403-1409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly M. Halvorson ◽  
Eliot Hazeltine

1991 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart T. Klapp ◽  
Kimberly A. Porter-Graham ◽  
Annabel R. Hoifjeld

1982 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gert ten Hoopen ◽  
Simone Akerboom ◽  
Emile Raaymakers

1979 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 431-432
Author(s):  
Anthony G. Greenwald

This research concerns timesharing, the simultaneous performance of decision responses, and ideomotor (IM) compatibility, an arrangement in which the stimuli for a decision task resemble closely the stimuli generated as feedback from performing their required responses (Greenwald, 1970). (An illustration of IM compatibility is saying a word in response to hearing it.) IM compatibility is a special case of stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility, which is the more general category of task arrangements in which stimulus-response assignments are such as to facilitate the choice process. The present research explored the special characteristics of IM compatibility by examining timesharing efficiency for S-R compatible tasks that possess IM compatibility and ones that lack it.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document