Birds adjust acoustic directionality to beam their antipredator calls to predators and conspecifics

Animals in many vertebrate species vocalize in response to predators, but it is often unclear whether these antipredator calls function to communicate with predators, conspecifics or both. We evaluated the function of antipredator calls in 10 species of passerines by measuring the acoustic directionality of these calls in response to experimental presentations of a model predator. Acoustic directionality quantifies the radiation pattern of vocalizations and may provide evidence about the receiver of these calls. We predicted that antipredator calls would have a lower directionality if they function to communicate with surrounding conspecifics, and a higher directionality and aimed at the receiver if they function to communicate with the predator. Our results support both of these functions. Overall, the birds produce antipredator calls that have a relatively low directionality, suggesting that the calls radiate in many directions to alert conspecifics. However, birds in some species increase the directionality of their calls when facing the predator. They can even direct their calls towards the predator when facing lateral to it—effectively vocalizing sideways towards the predator. These results suggest that antipredator calls in some species are used to communicate both to conspecifics and to predators, and that birds adjust the directionality of their calls with remarkable sophistication according to the context in which they are used.

Repetitive calls of juvenile Richardson's ground squirrels (Spermophilus richardsonii) communicate response urgency

Richardson's ground squirrels, Spermophilus richardsonii, produce both repetitive and non-repetitive antipredator calls. While many hypotheses have been advanced to explain non-repetitive calls, the function of repetitive calling has received relatively little attention. We presented juvenile Richardson's ground squirrels with a predator model at distances ranging from 1 to 8 m and recorded the subsequent repetitive calls on digital audiotape. The rate of calling was inversely correlated with the distance between the model and the caller, with distance explaining almost 24% of the variation in call rate. To determine whether call recipients use that information, we manipulated the intersyllable latency of a single repetitive call exemplar to form 3 test stimuli varying only in call rate. Across 16 Richardson's ground squirrel colonies to which these calls were broadcast, the proportion of squirrels assuming the highly vigilant, alert posture increased with the rate of the repetitive call presented. Hence, juvenile Richardson's ground squirrels appear to communicate the proximity and presumably the degree of threat posed by potential predators.