Trends in Utilization and Outcomes of Orbital, Laser, and Excisional Atherectomy for Lower Extremity Revascularization

Purpose: The aim of this study is to analyze the utilization pattern of atherectomy modalities and compare their outcomes. Materials and Methods: All patients undergoing atherectomy in the 2010–2016 Vascular Quality Initiative Database were identified. Utilization of orbital, laser, or excisional atherectomy was obtained. Characteristics and outcomes of patients treated for isolated femoropopliteal and isolated tibial disease by different modalities were compared. Results: Atherectomy use increased from 10.3% to 18.3% of all peripheral interventions (n = 122 938). Orbital atherectomy was most commonly used and increased from 59.4% in 2010 to 63.2% of all atherectomies in 2016, while laser atherectomy decreased from 19.2% to 13.1%. Atherectomy was mostly used for treatment of isolated femoropopliteal disease (51.1%), followed by combined femoropopliteal and tibial disease (25.8%) and isolated tibial disease (11.7%). In isolated femoropopliteal revascularization, excisional atherectomy was associated with higher rate of perforation (1.2%) compared with laser (0.4%) and orbital atherectomy (0.5%). The technical success of orbital atherectomy (96.7%) was lower compared with excisional atherectomy (98.7%). Concomitant stenting was significantly higher with laser atherectomy (43.0%) compared with orbital (27.2%) and excisional (26.1%) atherectomy. Nevertheless, there was no difference in 1-year primary patency, reintervention, major amputation, improvement in ambulatory status, or mortality. Multivariable analysis also demonstrated no difference in 1-year primary patency and major ipsilateral amputation among the modalities. In isolated tibial revascularization, there were no differences in perioperative outcomes among the modalities. Excisional atherectomy was associated with the highest 1-year primary patency (88.1%). After adjusting for confounders, excisional atherectomy remained associated with superior 1-year primary patency compared with orbital atherectomy (odds ratio [OR] = 2.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.18–5.68]), and excisional atherectomy remained associated with a lower rate of 1-year major ipsilateral amputation compared with laser atherectomy (OR = 0.29, 95% CI = [0.09–0.95]). Conclusion: Atherectomy use has increased, driven primarily by orbital atherectomy. Despite significant variation in perioperative outcomes, there were no differences in 1-year outcomes among the different modalities when used for treating isolated femoropopliteal disease. In isolated tibial disease treatment, excisional atherectomy was associated with higher 1-year primary patency compared with orbital atherectomy and decreased major ipsilateral amputation rates compared with laser atherectomy. These differences warrant further investigation into the comparative effectiveness of atherectomy modalities in various vascular beds.

Intravascular Ultrasound Assessment and Correlation With Angiographic Findings of Arterial Dissections Following Auryon Laser Atherectomy and Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty: Results of the iDissection Auryon Laser Study

Background Femoropopliteal arterial angiographic dissections with the use of the Auryon laser atherectomy system (previously the B-laser) have been infrequent and non–flow limiting. However, the pattern of these dissections (depth and arc) using intravascular ultrasound remains unknown. Materials and Methods We prospectively enrolled 29 patients in the iDissection Auryon study. The primary objective was to define the occurrence of new adventitial injury with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Secondary objectives included distal embolization and bailout stenting as judged by the operator because of 30% or more residual narrowing and/or NHLBI (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute) angiographic dissection C and higher. Core laboratory analysis was carried on all cases except for 1 patient (that crossed over to Jetstream atherectomy). Dissections were classified according to the iDissection classification as involving the intima (A), media (B), and adventitia (C) and ≤ 180-° arc (1) or >180-° arc (2). Overall, 22 of 29 patients had an embolic filter (per protocol). Results Median lesion and treated lengths were 100.0 and 150.0 mm, respectively. Vessel diameter by IVUS was 6.5 ± 1.5 mm. Chronic total occlusion (CTO) was present in 24.1% of cases. The arc of calcium was: no calcium in 27.6%, <90° in 13.8%, 90° to 180° in 20.7%, and >180° in 34.4%. Lesion severity was reduced to a median of 14% post laser and adjunctive percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) from a baseline of 76%. Bailout stenting occurred in 6 of 28 (21.4%) patients (3 for dissections, 2 for residual >30%, and 1 for both) and primary stenting in 1 of 28 (3.6%). By IVUS, there were 9 new dissections post laser (1 adventitial; 3≥180°) and 21 new dissections post laser and PTA (3 adventitial; 1≥180°). No distal embolization requiring treatment was seen and no macrodebris ≥2 mm was recovered in the filters. Conclusion The Auryon laser atherectomy system had minimal rate of adventitial injury despite complex disease with relatively low bailout stent rate and no clinically significant macrodebris.

Photoablative atherectomy followed by a paclitaxel-coated balloon to inhibit restenosis in instent femoro-popliteal obstructions (PHOTOPAC)

Summary: Background: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of preparing instent femoropopliteal lesion with photoablative laser atherectomy or plain balloon angioplasty (POBA) prior to drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. Patients and methods: The prospective, multicenter, randomized study enrolled patients with Rutherford-Becker-class (RBC) 1 to 5 and instent lesions located in superficial femoral artery and/or popliteal artery above the knee joint. Primary endpoint was target lesion percent stenosis at 1 year as determined by the angiographic core-laboratory. Secondary endpoints included procedural success, major adverse event rate, clinical improvement and improvement in ankle-brachial index (ABI), clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), and primary patency rate at until 2-year follow-up. Results: The study was terminated prior to the enrollment goal due to slow enrollment. Thirty patients were included in the laser plus DCB cohort and 31 patients in the control cohort. Primary endpoint was not significantly different (p=0.331). Procedural success was 83.3% and 87.1% for the laser plus DCB and the control cohort, respectively. Serious adverse events at 30 days and 1-year were not statistically different between the two cohorts. For the ABI, significant improvements were present at discharge as well as at the follow-up visits. This was also evident for the RBC at the follow-up visits. One- and two-year freedom from CD-TLR was 86.7% vs. 87.1%, and 63.6% vs. 72%, respectively. Duplex derived primary patency was 90% at 6-months, 65.5% at one year and 56.5% at two year for the laser cohort and 90.3%, 75.9% and 53.8% for the control cohort. Conclusions: Safety of instent photoablative laser atherectomy followed by DCB angioplasty is confirmed by this study. Due to the small sample size, no benefit over POBA as vessel preparation could be shown.