ankle ultrasound
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

6
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

1
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-362
Author(s):  
ENGY Sh. ELKAYAL, M.D.; MOHMAD A. MAHMOUD, M.D. ◽  
MOHAMED S. ARAFA, M.D.; AHMED M. MOHAMED, M.Sc.
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 103-110
Author(s):  
Luminita Enache ◽  
◽  
Claudiu C. Popescu ◽  
Catalin Codreanu ◽  
Maria Suta ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 651-661
Author(s):  
Hosik Seok ◽  
Sun Hwa Lee ◽  
Seong Jong Yun

Background Ankle ultrasound imaging could be an option with higher priority due to its lack of radiation, and cost- and time-effectiveness. However, previous studies regarding anterior tibiofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament injuries have shown varied results. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ankle ultrasound for anterior tibiofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament injuries. Material and Methods PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for diagnostic accuracy studies that used ultrasound for diagnosing anterior tibiofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament injuries. Bivariate and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic modeling were used to evaluate diagnostic performance. Subgroup analysis was performed using studies according to severity of the injury (complete and partial anterior tibiofibular ligament tear). We performed meta-regression analyses for heterogeneity exploration. Results Ten articles involving a total of 380 patients were included. For anterior tibiofibular ligament injury, the summary sensitivity, summary specificity, and area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were 0.99, 0.92, and 0.99, respectively. For calcaneofibular ligament injury, the summary sensitivity, summary specificity, and AUC were 0.95, 0.99, and 0.95, respectively. In subgroup analysis, for complete anterior tibiofibular ligament tear, the summary sensitivity, summary specificity, and AUC were 0.96, 0.82, and 0.96, respectively. For partial anterior tibiofibular ligament tear, the summary sensitivity, summary specificity, and AUC were 0.90, 0.82, and 0.93, respectively. Among the various potential covariates, proportion of anterior tibiofibular ligament tear, ultrasound interpreter, and reference standard were associated with specificity heterogeneity. Conclusion Ankle ultrasound demonstrates high diagnostic performance in the diagnosis of anterior tibiofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament injuries. We recommend ultrasound performed by a musculoskeletal radiologist as a first-line diagnostic tool to diagnose anterior tibiofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament injuries.


BMUS Bulletin ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 28-32
Author(s):  
M Bell ◽  
EGM McNally

Foot and ankle ultrasound is most commonly used to examine the tendons around the ankle in cases of suspected tears or tenosynovitis. Ultrasound however is also useful in assessing joint fluid, the ligaments, fasclitis, metatarsalgia. Impingement syndromes and in dynamic imaging or guided treatment. The Achilles tendon is the most frequently imaged tendon with the peroneal tendons, anterior and posterior tibials, extensor dlgitorum longus, extensor hallucis longus, flexor digltorum longus and flexor hallucis longus also readily accessible to ultrasound imaging.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document