tracheoesophageal speech
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

137
(FIVE YEARS 9)

H-INDEX

21
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2020 ◽  
pp. 000348942097614
Author(s):  
Christopher Boyd ◽  
James Houghton ◽  
Logan Harrold ◽  
Justin Bond ◽  
James D. Garnett ◽  
...  

Objective(s): To evaluate complication rate and abandonment rate after tracheoesophageal puncture and to assess factors associated with these outcome measures. Methods: Retrospective review of laryngectomy patients seen at a single academic institution between 1/1/2003 and 12/1/2018. Charts reviewed for demographics, medical comorbidities, tumor characteristics, surgical data, adjuvant treatment history, and complications related to laryngectomy or tracheoesophageal puncture. Complications were divided into minor and major. Results: A total of 293 laryngectomees met inclusion criteria. Of these, 69 patients (23.5%) underwent tracheoesophageal puncture. Average follow up was 64.6 months (SD 58.3). Overall laryngectomy complication rate was 43.3%. Overall tracheoesophageal puncture complication rate was 73.9%, with 39.1% of patients having major complications and 34.8% having minor complications only. Total abandonment rate for tracheoesophageal puncture was 34.8%. No associations were seen between tracheoesophageal puncture complication or abandonment rates based on age, gender, race, or insurance status. An increased rate of laryngectomy complications was seen after primary tracheoesophageal puncture (76.5% vs 41.3%, P = .005). Conclusion: Tracheoesophageal puncture outcomes were similar in patients with varied demographic, medical, and treatment backgrounds. When considering timing, our findings suggest that patients should be counseled on the possibility of increased complication risk after primary tracheoesophageal puncture. In those in whom the surgeon already has concerns about wound healing, it may be prudent to avoid primary tracheoesophageal puncture. The relatively high abandonment rate emphasizes the value of this measure of tracheoesophageal puncture outcome and highlights the need for appropriate patient counseling and prospective studies assessing the decision to abandon.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (04) ◽  
pp. e535-e538
Author(s):  
Itzhak Brook ◽  
Joseph F Goodman

AbstractTracheoesophageal speech is the most common voicing method used by laryngectomees. This method requires the installation of tracheoesophageal prosthesis (TEP), which requires continuous maintenance to achieve optimal speaking abilities and prevent fluid leakage from the esophagus to the trachea. The present manuscript describes the available types of TEPs, the procedures used to maintain them, the causes for their failure due to fluid leakage, and the methods used for their prevention. Knowledge and understanding of these issues can assist the otolaryngologist in caring for laryngectomees who use tracheoesophageal speech.


2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 363-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danijela Dragičević ◽  
Rajko M. Jović ◽  
Vladimir Kljajić ◽  
Ljiljana Vlaški ◽  
Slobodan Savović

2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 675-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugenia Allegra ◽  
Ignazio La Mantia ◽  
Maria Rita Bianco ◽  
Gaetano Davide Drago ◽  
Maria Cristina Le Fosse ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document