fluid leakage
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

485
(FIVE YEARS 89)

H-INDEX

32
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kohei Igarashi ◽  
Atsushi Kuge ◽  
Hiroshi Homma ◽  
Tetsu Yamaki ◽  
Rei Kondo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Recently, bone fixation materials have been developed as surgical materials. Bioabsorbable materials offer several advantages over other materials and are widely used. We report a rare case of the fracture of bioresorbable plates caused by head injury and describe some considerations. Case description A 6-year-old boy suffered from consciousness disturbance. He was admitted to our hospital and diagnosed with left frontal subcortical hemorrhage due to ruptured arteriovenous malformation (AVM). He received the surgery of removal of the AVM with decompressive craniectomy. He was discharged without any neurologic deficit and underwent the cranioplasty 4 months after the initial surgery. Two months after the last treatment, he was fallen and hit his left frontal head. The next day, he noticed an abnormal bulge in the injured area. We diagnosed the bulging as cerebrospinal fluid leakage because of the dural tear. The repairment of dural tear was performed. We found that two bioresorbable plates used by cranioplasty were both cracked, and the dura mater beneath them was torn. We repaired the damaged dura with an artificial dura mater. After surgery, cerebrospinal fluid leakage did not occur. Conclusion It has been reported that the durability of bioresorbable plates is no less than that of titanium plates. We experienced a relatively rare case in which bioabsorbable plate used for bone fixation was damaged due to head trauma. After craniotomy or cranioplasty using bioresorbable plates, special attention should be paid to head trauma that involves bone flap sinking force and side bending stress.


Author(s):  
Shusuke Hagihara ◽  
Hideki Ohta ◽  
Jun Tanaka ◽  
Teruaki Shiokawa ◽  
Yoshiyuki Matsumoto ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
jin tang ◽  
qilin lu ◽  
ying li ◽  
congjun wu ◽  
xugui li ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To analyze the risk factors of cerebrospinal fluid leakage(CSFL) following lumbar posterior surgery and summarize the related management strategies. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 3179 patients with CSFL strategies lumbar posterior surgery in our hospital from January 2019 to December 2020. There were 807 cases of lumbar disc hemiation(LDH), 1143 cases of lumbar spinal stenosi (LSS), 1122 cases of lumbar spondylolisthesis(LS), 93 cases of lumbar degenerative scoliosis(LDS),14 cases of lumbar spinal benign tumor(LST). Data of gender, age, body mass index(BMI), duration of disease, diabete,smoking history, preoperative epidural hormone injection, number of surgical levels, surgical methods (total laminar decompression, fenestration decompression), revision surgery, extubation time, suture removal time, and complications were recorded.Results: The incidence of 115 cases with cerebrospinal fluid leakage,was 3.62% (115/3179).One-way ANOVA showed that gender, body mass index(BMI), smoking history, combined with type 2 diabetes and surgical method had no significant effect on CSFL(P >0.05). Age, type of disease, duration of disease, preoperative epidural hormone injection, number of surgical levels and revision surgery had effects on CSFL(P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that type of disease, preoperative epidural hormone injection, number of surgical levels and revision surgery were significantly affected CSFL(P<0.05), and duration of disease and age of the patients were not significantly affected CSFL (P >0.05).The extubation time of CSFL patients ranged from 7 to 11 days, with an average of 7.11±0.48 days, the extubation time of patients without CSFL was 1-3 days, with an average of 2.02±0.13 days, and there was a statistical difference between the two groups(P < 0.05).The removal time of CSFL patients was 12-14 days, with an average of 13.11±2.67 days, and the removal time of patients without CSFL was 10-14 days, with an average of 12.87±2.19 days, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Type of disease, preoperative epidural hormone injection, number of surgical levels and revision surgery were the risk factors for CSFL. Effective prevention were the key to CSFL in lumbar surgery.Once appear, CSFL can also be effectively dealt with without obvious adverse reactions after intraoperative effectively repair dural, head down, adequate drainage after operation, the high position, rehydration treatment, and other treatments.


Author(s):  
Birgit Coucke ◽  
Lura Van Gerven ◽  
Steven De Vleeschouwer ◽  
Frank Van Calenbergh ◽  
Johannes van Loon ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document