biocidal product regulation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

1
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 629-633
Author(s):  
Apolline J.C. Roger

Case T-521/14, Kingdom of Sweden v European Commission, Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 December 2015, ECLI:EU:T:2015:976Case T-521/14 is a new stop on the perilous journey towards the appropriate regulation of endocrine disrupting chemicals. The Biocidal Product Regulation required the Commission to adopt criteria defining endocrine disrupting properties by 13 December 2013; the deadline was not respected. Even though the failure to act was obvious, the Court's reasoning in T-521/14 matters greatly. It exposes a structural weakness in the EU's risk governance system by reminding the Commission that strong private opposition to regulatory action does not justify tampering with the level of environmental or health protection set by the legislator. The now adopted criteria indicate that this lesson was not taken to heart.


Nanomaterials ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Brinch ◽  
Steffen Hansen ◽  
Nanna Hartmann ◽  
Anders Baun

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document