developmental hourglass
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

22
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuki Mukaigasa ◽  
Chie Sakuma ◽  
Hiroyuki Yaginuma

SummaryThe developmental hourglass model predict that embryonic morphology is most conserved at mid-embryonic stage and diverge at early and late stage. This model is generally considered by whole embryonic level. Here, we demonstrate that the hourglass model is also applicable to the more reduced element, the spinal cord. In the middle of the spinal cord development, dorsoventrally arrayed neuronal progenitor domains are established, which is conserved among vertebrates. We found that, by comparing the single-cell transcriptomes between mice and zebrafish, V3 interneurons, a subpopulation of the post-mitotic spinal neurons, display the divergent molecular profiles. We also found non-conservation of cis-regulatory elements located around the progenitor fate determinants, indicating the rewiring of the upstream gene regulatory network. These results demonstrate that, despite the conservation of the progenitor domains, processes before and after the progenitor domain specification has diverged. This study may help understand the molecular basis of the developmental hourglass model.



Author(s):  
Andrew G. Cridge ◽  
Peter K. Dearden ◽  
Lynette R. Brownfield


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jialin Liu ◽  
Rebecca R. Viales ◽  
Pierre Khoueiry ◽  
James P. Reddington ◽  
Charles Girardot ◽  
...  

Inter-species comparisons of both morphology and gene expression within a phylum have revealed a period in the middle of embryogenesis with more similarity between species compared to earlier and later time-points. This developmental hourglass pattern has been observed in many phyla, yet the evolutionary constraints on gene expression, and underlying mechanisms of how this is regulated, remains elusive. Moreover, the role of positive selection on gene regulation in the more diverged earlier and later stages of embryogenesis remains unknown. Here, using DNase-seq to identify regulatory regions in two distant Drosophila species (D. melanogaster and D. virilis), we assessed the evolutionary conservation and adaptive evolution of enhancers throughout multiple stages of embryogenesis. This revealed a higher proportion of conserved enhancers at the phylotypic period, providing a regulatory basis for the hourglass expression pattern. Using an in silico mutagenesis approach, we detect signatures of positive selection on developmental enhancers at early and late stages of embryogenesis, with a depletion at the phylotypic period, suggesting positive selection as one evolutionary mechanism underlying the hourglass pattern of animal evolution.



Author(s):  
Andrew G. Cridge ◽  
Peter K. Dearden ◽  
Lynette R. Brownfield


2017 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 69-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hajk-Georg Drost ◽  
Philipp Janitza ◽  
Ivo Grosse ◽  
Marcel Quint


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hajk-Georg Drost ◽  
Alexander Gabel ◽  
Tomislav Domazet-Lošo ◽  
Marcel Quint ◽  
Ivo Grosse

AbstractCombining transcriptome data of biological processes or response to stimuli with evolutionary information such as the phylogenetic conservation of genes or their sequence divergence rates enables the investigation of evolutionary constraints on these processes or responses. Such phylotranscriptomic analyses recently unraveled that mid-developmental transcriptomes of fly, fish, and cress were dominated by evolutionarily conserved genes and genes under negative selection and thus recapitulated the developmental hourglass on the transcriptomic level. Here, we present a protocol for performing phylotranscriptomic analyses on any biological process of interest. When applying this protocol, users are capable of detecting different evolutionary constraints acting on different stages of the biological process of interest in any species. For each step of the protocol, modular and easy-to-use open-source software tools are provided, which enable a broad range of scientists to apply phylotranscriptomic analyses to a wide spectrum of biological questions.



2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 345-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter G Hendrickson ◽  
Bradley R Cairns


2016 ◽  
Vol 117 (5) ◽  
pp. 833-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew G. Cridge ◽  
Peter K. Dearden ◽  
Lynette R. Brownfield


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document