seabirds at sea
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

19
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 0)



2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Bolduc ◽  
David A. Fifield

Introduction:Knowledge of seasonal distribution and abundance of species is paramount in identifying key areas. Field data collection and analysis must provide best information concerning seabirds at-sea to optimize conservation efforts.Methods:We tested whether modeling of detection probabilities, and density estimates with their coefficients of variation obtained from the point-transect method provided more robust and precise results than the more commonly used line-transect method. We subdivided our data by species groups (alcids, and aerialist species), and into two behavior categories (flyingvs.swimming). We also computed density estimates from the strip-transect and point count methods, to relate differences between transect methods to their counterparts that do not consider a decreasing probability of detection with distance from the observer. We used data collected in the Gulf of St. Lawrence between 2009 and 2010 when observers simultaneously conducted line- and point-transect sampling.Results:Models of detection probability using the line-transect method had a good fit to the observed data, whereas detection probability histograms of point-transect analyses suggested substantial evasive movements within the 0-50 m interval. This resulted in point-transect detection probability models displaying poor goodness of fit. Line transects yielded density estimates 1.2-2.6 times higher than those obtained using the point-transect method. Differences in percent coefficients of variation between line-transect and point-transect density estimates ranged between 0.2 and 5.9.Conclusion:Using 300 m wide line-transects provided the best results, while other methods could lead to biased conclusions regarding species density in the local landscape and the relative composition of seabird communities among species and behavior groups.



2014 ◽  
Vol 172 ◽  
pp. 15-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Lieske ◽  
David A. Fifield ◽  
Carina Gjerdrum
Keyword(s):  


Ibis ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 155 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilya M. D. Maclean ◽  
Mark M. Rehfisch ◽  
Henrik Skov ◽  
Chris B. Thaxter


2009 ◽  
Vol 391 ◽  
pp. 117-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
J González-Solís ◽  
SA Shaffer


2008 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 308-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leandro Bugoni ◽  
Tatiana S. Neves ◽  
Fabiano V. Peppes ◽  
Robert W. Furness
Keyword(s):  


Ecography ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 695-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grégoire Certain ◽  
Edwige Bellier ◽  
Benjamin Planque ◽  
Vincent Bretagnolle


2003 ◽  
Vol 263 ◽  
pp. 275-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Raymond ◽  
EJ Woehler


1994 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 445 ◽  
Author(s):  
SJM Blaber ◽  
DA Milton

The distribution and abundance of seabirds was documented at sea in the Gulf of Carpentaria in December 1990 and November 1991. Of the 17 species recorded, only the crested tern, least frigatebird, brown booby and streaked shearwater were widespread. The first three species were seen mainly in coastal waters; streaked shearwaters were seen only in the central north-western gulf. The common tern, roseate tern, little tern, sooty tern, black-naped tern, common noddy and greater frigatebird were either sparsely distributed or uncommon. The list includes five terrestrial species. The distribution of the seabirds is discussed in relation to proximity to breeding and roosting sites, food availability, the effects of discards from prawn trawling, and water currents.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document