almost perfect nonlinear functions
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

16
(FIVE YEARS 8)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Sihem Mesnager ◽  
Constanza Riera ◽  
Pantelimon Stanica ◽  
Haode Yan ◽  
Zhengchun Zhou

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (03) ◽  
pp. 411-419
Author(s):  
Masamichi Kuroda

Generalized almost perfect nonlinear (GAPN) functions were defined to satisfy some generalizations of basic properties of almost perfect nonlinear (APN) functions for even characteristic. In particular, on finite fields of even characteristic, GAPN functions coincide with APN functions. In this paper, we study monomial GAPN functions for odd characteristic. We give monomial GAPN functions whose algebraic degree are maximum or minimum on a finite field of odd characteristic. Moreover, we define a generalization of exceptional APN functions and give typical examples.


2019 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 471-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Sălăgean

Abstract In the design of cryptographic functions, the properties of their discrete derivatives have to be carefully considered, as many cryptographic attacks exploit these properties. One can therefore attempt to first construct derivatives with the desired properties and then recover the function itself. Recently Suder developed an algorithm for reconstructing a function (also called antiderivative) over the finite field $$\mathop {{\mathbb {F}}}_{2^n}$$F2n given its discrete derivatives in up to n linearly independent directions. Pasalic et al. also presented an algorithm for determining a function over $$\mathop {{\mathbb {F}}}_{p^n}$$Fpn given one of its derivatives. Both algorithms involve solving a $$p^n \times p^n$$pn×pn system of linear equations; the functions are represented as univariate polynomials over $$\mathop {{\mathbb {F}}}_{p^n}$$Fpn. We show that this apparently high computational complexity is not intrinsic to the problem, but rather a consequence of the representation used. We describe a simpler algorithm, with quasilinear complexity, provided we work with a different representation of the functions. Namely they are polynomials in n variables over $$\mathop {{\mathbb {F}}}_{p}$$Fp in algebraic normal form (for $$p>2$$p>2, additionally, we need to use the falling factorial polynomial basis) and the directions of the derivatives are the canonical basis of $$\mathop {{\mathbb {F}}}_{p}^n$$Fpn. Algorithms for other representations (the directions of the derivatives not being the canonical basis vectors or the univariate polynomials over $$\mathop {{\mathbb {F}}}_{p^n}$$Fpn mentioned above) can be obtained by combining our algorithm with converting between representations. However, the complexity of these conversions is, in the worst case, exponential. As an application, we develop a method for constructing new quadratic PN (Perfect Nonlinear) functions. We use an approach similar to the one of Suder, who used antiderivatives to give an alternative formulation of the methods of Weng et al. and Yu et al. for searching for new quadratic APN (Almost Perfect Nonlinear) functions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasiya A. Gorodilova

AbstractThe paper is concerned with combinatorial description of almost perfect nonlinear functions (APN-functions). A complete characterization of


2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (06) ◽  
pp. 1351-1367 ◽  
Author(s):  
LAURENT POINSOT ◽  
ALEXANDER POTT

The purpose of this paper is to present extended definitions and characterizations of the classical notions of APN and maximum nonlinear Boolean functions to deal with the case of mappings from a finite group K to another one N with the possibility that one or both groups are non-Abelian.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document