figural assignment
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

1
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 1385
Author(s):  
Colin Flowers ◽  
Mary Peterson

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 631-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph L. Brooks ◽  
Stephen E. Palmer

Edge-assignment determines the perception of relative depth across an edge and the shape of the closer side. Many cues determine edge-assignment, but relatively little is known about the neural mechanisms involved in combining these cues. Here, we manipulated extremal edge and attention cues to bias edge-assignment such that these two cues either cooperated or competed. To index their neural representations, we flickered figure and ground regions at different frequencies and measured the corresponding steady-state visual-evoked potentials (SSVEPs). Figural regions had stronger SSVEP responses than ground regions, independent of whether they were attended or unattended. In addition, competition and cooperation between the two edge-assignment cues significantly affected the temporal dynamics of edge-assignment processes. The figural SSVEP response peaked earlier when the cues causing it cooperated than when they competed, but sustained edge-assignment effects were equivalent for cooperating and competing cues, consistent with a winner-take-all outcome. These results provide physiological evidence that figure–ground organization involves competitive processes that can affect the latency of figural assignment.


2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
pp. 725-725
Author(s):  
E. Skow-Grant ◽  
M. A. Peterson

Perception ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 26 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 366-366
Author(s):  
R E Sorensen ◽  
J Driver

When figure - ground assignment reverses for a given contour, convexities along it become concavi- ties, and vice versa. Baylis and Driver (1995 Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance21 1323 – 1342) examined the possible implications of this effect for the perception of symmetry between contours. Using contrast reversal to determine figure - ground assignment, they argued that the ease of detecting symmetry between two contours depends on whether convexities along them match following figural assignment. However, their results might be attributed to the contrast polarity of individual edges instead. We used random-dot stereograms to vary figure - ground assignment for edges while holding contrast polarity constant. By placing the areas on either side of each contour at various depth planes, conditions were created in which the convex parts yielded for related contours either matched or mismatched following figural assignment. Particular depth arrangements which yielded matching convex parts for symmetrical contours yielded mismatching parts for translated contours, and vice versa. The results confirmed that the relative ease of symmetry-detection versus translation-detection depends on the convex parts yielded for each contour following figural assignment. These findings suggest that the perception of symmetry between contours arises only after they have been assigned to a figure on one of their sides, and is based on a higher-level interpretation of each contour in terms of convex parts, rather than lower-level properties of the image.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document