scholarly journals Fondaparinux vs Enoxaparin for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Major Orthopedic SurgeryA Meta-analysis of 4 Randomized Double-blind Studies

2002 ◽  
Vol 162 (16) ◽  
pp. 1833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander G. G. Turpie
1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (08) ◽  
pp. 918-924 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.D. Hull ◽  
G.F Pineo

IntroductionMajor orthopedic surgery, particularly total joint replacement or hip fracture, represents a high risk of future development of postoperative venous thromboembolism and warrants the routine use of prophylaxis with either mechanical devices or pharmacological agents. The aim of prophylaxis is to prevent fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) and the morbidity of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), particularly the development of post-thrombotic syndrome. Patterns of clinical practice, with respect to the prevention of venous thromboembolism and the appropriate use of anticoagulants for the treatment of thrombotic disease, have been strongly influenced by recent consensus conferences.1,2 Rules of evidence for assessing the literature have been applied to all recommendations regarding the prevention and treatment of thrombotic disease. These results were extrapolated using evidence gleaned from major clinical disorders and are based only on nonrandomized clinical trials or case series.1-3 Data from a large number of Level I clinical trials in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery have provided answers to many of the questions regarding prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism. In this review, we will discuss the prevention of venous thromboembolism following orthopedic surgery and discuss some of the controversial issues where further studies are required.


2016 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
pp. 560-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshio Yamaguchi ◽  
Hideo Wada ◽  
Shinichi Miyazaki ◽  
Masahiro Hasegawa ◽  
Hiroki Wakabayashi ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
pp. 249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karmel L. Tambunan ◽  
Errol U. Hutagalung ◽  
Lugyanti Sukrisman ◽  
Ifran Saleh ◽  
S. B. Gunawan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Richard C. Becker ◽  
Frederick A. Spencer

Venous thromboembolism represents a true worldwide medical problem that is encountered within all realms of practice. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs in approximately 100 patients per 100,000 population yearly in the United States and increases exponentially with each decade of life (White, 2003). Approximately one-third of patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) experience a pulmonary embolism (PE). Death occurs within 1 month in 6% of patients with DVT and 12% of those with PE. Early mortality is associated strongly with presentation as PE, advanced age, malignancy, and underlying cardiovascular disease. An experience dating back several decades has provided a better understanding of disease states and conditions associated with VTE (Anderson and Spencer, 2003). Given the potential morbidity and mortality associated with VTE, it is apparent that prophylaxis represents an important goal in clinical practice. A variety of anticoagulants including unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), and warfarin have been studied. More recently, two new agents have been developed that warrant discussion. Fondaparinux underwent a worldwide development program in orthopedic surgery for the prophylaxis of VTE. The program consisted mainly of four large, randomized, double-blind phase II studies comparing fondaparinux (SC), at a dose of 2.5 mg starting 6 hours postoperatively, with the two enoxaparin regimens approved for VTE prophylaxis—40 mg qd or 30 mg twice daily beginning 12 hours postoperatively. The results support a greater protective effect with fondaparinux, yielding a 55.2% relative risk reduction of VTE (Bauer et al., 2001; Eriksson et al., 2001; Lassen et al., 2002; Turpie et al., 2001, 2002; ). A European program of three large-scale clinical trials (MElagatran for THRombin inhibition in Orthopedic surgery [METHRO] I, II, and III, and EXpanded PRophylaxis Evaluation Surgery Study [EXPRESS]) (Eriksson et al., 2002a, b, 2003a, b) evaluated the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous melagatran followed by oral ximelagatran compared with LMWH for thromboprophylaxis following total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) surgery.


Orthopedics ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 506-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan I. Arcelus ◽  
James C. Kudrna ◽  
Joseph A. Caprini

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document