Bone Marrow Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Fever of Unknown Origin in Patients With Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

1997 ◽  
Vol 157 (14) ◽  
pp. 1577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natividad Benito
Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4840-4840
Author(s):  
Ibrahim F Ibrahim ◽  
Daisha J Cipher ◽  
Jonathan E Dowell

Abstract Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy is a commonly utilized procedure to evaluate cytopenias and to diagnose disseminated infection and malignancy in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). The diagnostic utility of these studies is controversial and has not been evaluated extensively in the era since the development of highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART). The objective of this study was to analyze which variables are the strongest predictors for identifying a unique diagnosis on bone marrow biopsy, aspiration and culture in patients with AIDS. A unique diagnosis was defined as a previously unrecognized disorder that was not identified through other diagnostic studies (e.g. blood cultures, lymph node biopsy). We reviewed 1198 bone marrow biopsies performed at the Dallas VA Medical Center from January 1, 1998 to February 1, 2008 and identified 26 patients with AIDS who had the procedure. In 4 of these 26 patients (15.4%) a unique diagnosis was identified with bone marrow biopsy, aspiration or culture. The 4 diagnoses were disseminated mycobacteria avium, diffuse large B - cell lymphoma, acute myelogenous leukemia, and immune-mediated thrombocytopenia. The following variables were analyzed as predictors in a logistic regression model with unique diagnosis as the dependent variable (laboratory values were those performed closest to the time of bone marrow biopsy): CD4 count, viral load, white blood count, hemoglobin, platelets, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, presence or absence of fever, and whether the patient was on HAART therapy. In addition, the following indications for the bone marrow biopsy were analyzed as predictors for identifying a unique diagnosis: pancytopenia, anemia, leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, fever, lymphadenopathy. None of the variables or indications analyzed was a statistically significant predictor for identifying a unique diagnosis. However, certain indications for bone marrow biopsy were strongly suggestive: patients with fever (odds ratio 2.7; 95% CI .3 – 23.4; p = .38) or leucopenia (odds ratio 2.1; 95% CI 0.16 – 27.6; p = .57) as the indication for biopsy were more likely to be identified with a unique diagnosis. Conversely, patients with anemia as the indication were less likely to be found to have a unique diagnosis (odds ratio .4; 95% CI .04 – 4.4; p = .46). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses indicated that the median survival for the group as a whole was 8.5 months, and there was no difference in survival between those patients with a unique diagnosis and those without. One interesting and unanticipated finding was a sharp decline in the number of referrals for bone marrow biopsy in patients with AIDS at our institution during the time period analyzed despite an increase in the number of AIDS patients followed at the institution. From 1998–2004, 24 biopsies were performed and from 2005 – 2008 only 4 were done. We hypothesize this may be due to advancements in antiretroviral medications with less myelosuppressive profiles in addition to increased compliance with HAART among our patients with AIDS. This may be a topic of future study. In conclusion, bone marrow biopsy in patients with AIDS seldom provides a unique diagnosis. Patients with fever or leucopenia as the indication for biopsy may be more likely to be found to have a unique diagnosis.


2000 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 441-445
Author(s):  
Joanna Borkowski ◽  
Mojghan Amrikachi ◽  
S. David Hudnall

Abstract We report the case of a 41-year-old black man with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome who developed a severe chronic anemia due to parvovirus infection. Bone marrow biopsy revealed erythroid aplasia. The infectious nature of the anemia was not recognized, and the patient was treated with erythropoietin. The patient's reticulocyte response was inadequate, however, and he remained anemic. A second bone marrow biopsy showed erythroid hyperplasia and prominent intranuclear parvovirus inclusions within erythroid progenitors. Erythropoietin was discontinued and was followed by a course of intravenous immunoglobulin, which resulted in rapid correction of anemia. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of fulminant human parvovirus infection exacerbated by erythropoietin administration and documented by sequential bone marrow histologic examination. This case illustrates the critical importance of considering parvovirus in the etiology of chronic anemia with erythroid aplasia in immunocompromised patients.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 34-35
Author(s):  
Manasi M. Godbole ◽  
Peter A. Kouides

Introduction: Most studies on the diagnostic yield of bone marrow biopsy including the one by Hot et al. have focused on the yield of bone marrow biopsies in diagnosing the source of fever of unknown origin. However, there have not been any studies performed to our knowledge looking at overall practice patterns and yield of bone marrow biopsies for diagnoses other than fever of unknown origin. We aim to determine the most common indications for performing bone marrow biopsies in a community-based teaching hospital as well as the yield of the biopsies in patients with specified and unspecified pre-test indications to estimate the rate of uncertain post-test diagnoses. Methods: We performed a retrospective data collection study at Rochester General Hospital, NY. A comprehensive search was conducted in our electronic medical data to identify all patients who underwent bone marrow biopsies over a 5 year period from January 2011 - December 2016 for indications other than fever of unknown origin. Patient data including demographics, pre-bone marrow biopsy diagnosis and post-bone marrow diagnosis was obtained. All patients above the age of 18 who underwent bone marrow biopsy for indications other than fever of unknown origin or follow up treatment of a hematological malignancy were included. Results: A total of 223 biopsies were performed. The median age was 59 years (age range- 23-95). One hundred and sixteen patients were male and 107 were female. The most common indications for performing bone marrow biopsy were evaluation of the following possible conditions: multiple myeloma (n=54), myelodysplastic syndrome [MDS] (n=47), lymphoma (n=28) and leukemia (n=18) as well as non-specific indications such as pancytopenia (n=40), anemia (n=22) and thrombocytopenia (n=11). The proportion of cases confirmed by bone marrow biopsy was 45/54 (83%) with the pre-marrow diagnosis of multiple myeloma, 34/47 cases (72%) with the pre-marrow diagnosis of MDS, 15/18 (83%) with the pre-marrow diagnosis of leukemia and 13/28 (46%) in those with the pre-marrow diagnosis of rule out lymphoma. Thirteen cases (18%) with possible MDS had post-bone marrow diagnoses of leukemia, anemia of chronic disease, myelofibrosis or medication-related changes. Five out of twenty two cases (23%) for anemia and 3/11 cases (27%) for thrombocytopenia without otherwise specified pre-bone marrow etiology had uncertain diagnosis after bone marrow biopsy. Conclusion: In about a fifth of patients necessitating a bone marrow, the diagnosis is discordant and can be surprising. It is also worth reporting that in these discordant results, non-hematological causes such as medications, anemia due to chronic diseases or conditions such as cirrhosis or splenomegaly from other etiologies were among the final diagnoses. Interestingly, 20% of the patients with unspecified pre-bone marrow diagnoses such as anemia or thrombocytopenia in our study had an unclear post-bone marrow diagnosis despite undergoing bone marrow biopsy. Our findings are a reminder that the bone marrow exam does not always lead to a definitive diagnosis and the need by exclusion to include in the differential non-hematological etiologies such as nutritional deficiencies, chronic kidney disease or autoimmune disorders. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document